Patellofemoral Instability: Distal Realignment

2019 ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Suroosh Madhanipour ◽  
Kostas Michail ◽  
Sam Oussedik
Keyword(s):  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Distal Realignment

scholarly journals Appraisal of surgical treatment of 47 cases of patellofemoral instability

2002 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque ◽  
Alexandre Pagotto Pacheco ◽  
Arnaldo José Hernandez ◽  
Marco Martins Amatuzzi ◽  
José Ricardo Pécora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Late Diagnosis ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Proximal Realignment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Distal Realignment

INTRODUCTION: Patellofemoral instability is a common knee disease. Its etiology is complex and variable, with many components making different contributions in each individual, resulting in several distinct clinical presentations. Our goal was to analyze the results of surgical treatment in our hospital over a period of 10 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 55 knees of 47 patients who underwent surgery for patellofemoral instability and were classified into 2 main groups: proximal realignment and combined proximal and distal realignment. Three other groups were analyzed according to the duration of preoperative symptoms: less than 1 year (group I); 1 to 10 years (group II); and more than 10 years (group III). RESULTS: There were 62% good results overall, with 78% good results in groups I and II. Group III had 81% bad results, showing that a late diagnosis of advanced disease results in a poor prognosis. In addition to late diagnosis, bad results were usually associated with incorrect diagnosis or choice of surgical technique. There was no significant difference between isolated proximal realignment and combined proximal and distal realignment in groups I or II, but in group III, the combined technique yielded better results. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that patellofemoral instability should be addressed in its early stages. Patients with long-lasting symptoms or more severe disease seem to achieve better results with combined techniques. CONCLUSION: Proximal and distal realignments produce better results than isolated proximal realignment in patients with joint degeneration or with greater duration of disease. The realignment surgery does not produce good results in patients with advanced disease.

The Outcomes of Isolated Distal Realignment Procedures in Patellofemoral Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 547-552
Author(s):  
Si Heng Sharon Tan ◽  
Sheng Yang Lim ◽  
Keng Lin Wong ◽  
Chintan Doshi ◽  
Andrew Kean Seng Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Current Systematic Review ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Proximal Realignment ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Distal Realignment

AbstractDistal realignment procedures are now commonly performed routinely with proximal realignment procedures. Despite so, only a limited number of publications exist that have looked into the efficacy of isolated distal realignment procedures, and whether there is indeed a need for routine proximal realignment procedures to be added to the distal realignment procedures. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of isolated distal realignment procedures in the management of patellofemoral instability. The review was conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRSIMA) guidelines. All studies that reported the outcomes of isolated distal realignment procedures for patellofemoral instability were included. A total of six publications were included, with 347 knees. All studies consistently reported a decrease in the rates of patellofemoral instability or maltracking (odds ratio [OR]: < 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: < 0.01–0.01) and an increase in the odds of having a good outcome (OR: 0.01; 95% CI: < 0.01–0.02) after distal realignment procedures. A total of 24 out of 306 patients (7.8%) had postoperative instability or maltracking, and a total of 220 out of 303 patients (72.6%) were rated to have good or excellent outcomes postoperatively. Isolated distal realignment procedures can lead to good outcomes when used in the management of patellofemoral instability. These include a significantly decreased rate of patellofemoral instability or maltracking and a significantly increased number of patients with excellent or good outcomes postoperatively. Comparisons between patients with and without additional proximal realignment procedures suggest that additional proximal realignment procedures do not definitely improve the outcomes of distal realignment procedures and, therefore, should not be routinely performed in all patients undergoing distal realignment procedures. The Level of Evidence for this study is IV.

Effect of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Patellofemoral Instability Regardless of Predisposing Factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Ik Lee ◽  
Mohd Shahrul Azuan Jaffar ◽  
Han Gyeol Choi ◽  
Tae Woo Kim ◽  
Yong Seuk Lee
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Trochlear Dysplasia ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Predisposing Factors ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tilt ◽  
Case Series Study

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, regardless of the presence of predisposing factors. A total of 21 knees that underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction from March 2014 to August 2017 were included in this retrospective series. Radiographs of the series of the knee at flexion angles of 20, 40, and 60 degrees were acquired. The patellar position was evaluated using the patellar tilt angle, sulcus angle, congruence angle (CA), and Caton-Deschamps and Blackburne-Peel ratios. To evaluate the clinical outcome, the preoperative and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scoring scales were analyzed. To evaluate the postoperative outcomes based on the predisposing factors, the results were separately analyzed for each group. Regarding radiologic outcomes, 20-degree CA was significantly reduced from 10.37 ± 5.96° preoperatively to −0.94 ± 4.11° postoperatively (p = 0.001). In addition, regardless of the predisposing factors, delta values of pre- and postoperation of 20-degree CA were not significantly different in both groups. The IKDC score improved from 53.71 (range: 18–74) preoperatively to 94.71 (range: 86–100) at the last follow-up (p = 0.004), and the Lysholm score improved from 54.28 (range: 10–81) preoperatively to 94.14 (range: 86–100) at the last follow-up (p = 0.010). Isolated MPFL reconstruction provides a safe and effective treatment for patellofemoral instability, even in the presence of mild predisposing factors, such as trochlear dysplasia, increased patella height, increased TT–TG distance, or valgus alignment. This is a Level 4, case series study.

scholarly journals Comparable outcome for autografts and allografts in primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Migliorini ◽  
Andromahi Trivellas ◽  
Jörg Eschweiler ◽  
Matthias Knobe ◽  
Markus Tingart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Feasible Alternative ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Persistent Instability

Abstract Purpose This study updates the current evidence on the role of allografts versus autografts for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability. Methods The study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. In March 2021, a literature search in the main online databases was performed. Studies reporting quantitative data concerning primary MPFL reconstruction using an allograft were considered for inclusion. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected articles. Results Data from 12 studies (474 procedures) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 42.2 (15–78.5) months. The mean age was 21.1 ± 6.2 years. 64.9% (285 of 439) of patients were female. At the last follow-up, the Tegner (p < 0.0001), Kujala (p = 0.002) and the Lysholm (p < 0.0001) scores were minimally greater in the autografts. The similarity was found in the rate of persistent instability sensation and revision. The allograft group evidenced a lower rate of re-dislocations (p = 0.003). Conclusion Allografts may represent a feasible alternative to traditional autograft for MPFL reconstruction in selected patients with patellofemoral instability. Allograft tendons yielded similar PROMs, rates of persistent instability, and revision. Allograft reconstructions tended to have modestly lower re-dislocation rates. Level of evidence IV.

Dynamic KINE-MRI in patellofemoral instability in adolescents

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 2795-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon Regalado ◽  
Hannu Lintula ◽  
Matti Eskelinen ◽  
Hannu Kokki ◽  
Heikki Kröger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patellofemoral Instability

scholarly journals Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: analysis of outcomes and risk factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Migliorini ◽  
Francesco Oliva ◽  
Gayle D. Maffulli ◽  
Jörg Eschweiler ◽  
Matthias Knobe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tegner Score

Abstract Background The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is always damaged after patellar dislocation. In selected patients, MPFL reconstruction is necessary to restore a correct patellar tracking. Despite the large number of different techniques reported to reconstruct the MPFL, there is no consensus concerning the optimal procedure, and debates is still ongoing. The present study analysed the results after isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of patients presenting pathoanatomical risk factors was made. Methods In November 2020, the main electronic databases were accessed. All articles reporting the results of primary isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum 12-month follow-up were eligible. Results Data from a total of 1777 knees were collected. The mean age of the patients involved was 22.8 ± 3.4 years. The mean follow-up was 40.7 ± 25.8 months. Overall, the range of motion (+ 27.74; P < 0.0001) and all the other scores of interests improved at last follow-up: Kujala (+ 12.76; P = 0.0003), Lysholm (+ 15.69; P < 0.0001), Tegner score (+ 2.86; P = 0.006). Seventy-three of 1780 patients (4.1%) showed a positive apprehension test. Thirty of 1765 patients (1.7%) experienced re-dislocations, while 56 of 1778 patients (3.2%) showed persisting joint instability. Twenty-five of 1786 patients (1.4%) underwent revision surgeries. Conclusion Isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability provides reliable surgical outcomes. Patients with pathoanatomical predisposing factors reported worse surgical outcomes.

Distal Realignment of the Patellofemoral Joint

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Post ◽  
John P. Fulkerson
Keyword(s):  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Distal Realignment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document