Twenty-Five Years of Opposing Trends: The Demystification of Science in Law, and the Waning Relativism in the Sociology of Science

Author(s):  
David S. Caudill
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Adèle Paul-Hus ◽  
Nadine Desrochers ◽  
Jen Pecoskie ◽  
Vincent Larivière

Acknowledgments are recognized as relevant objectsof study in the sociology of science; yet it is difficult toextract a clear understanding of their value andfunctions in the reward system of science. Ouracknowledgment research genealogy suggests that aliterature-based framework could guide furtherstudies and research evaluation in academia.Les remerciements sont reconnus comme des objetsd’étude pertinents en sociologie des sciences; mais ilest difficile d’extraire une compréhension claire deleur valeur et de leurs fonctions dans le système derécompense de la science. Notre généalogie derecherche dans les remerciements suggère qu’uncadre d’étude fondé sur les publications pourraitguider d’autres études et l’évaluation de la recherchedans le milieu universitaire.


1962 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-376
Author(s):  
Howard J. Ehrlich
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Singer ◽  
Georgina Montgomery ◽  
Shannon Schmoll

Abstract Background STEM identity has been shown to have a powerful role in an individual’s success in educational environments, as well as on their career goals and trajectories. Historically, however, STEM identity formation for underrepresented students has been hampered by the lack of representation of in STEM fields, which predominantly consist of white males. One educational challenge is diversifying STEM classrooms, both in terms of the students themselves and also in terms of the science and scientists they learn about. Methods We piloted a 4-credit History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science course at Michigan State University. Students were tasked with creating exhibits focused on themes of diversity and inclusion in science for a real client. Using a STEM identity survey, we assessed students’ attitudes towards the sciences, issues of diversity in science, and their sense of belonging to their educational communities. We also had the students respond to various short-answer questions throughout the semester to better understand their experiences working on a collaborative authentic learning task. Results Our results suggest that authentic learning experiences based around ideas of diversity and inclusion can help students develop sense of belonging and positive STEM identities. Students demonstrated shifts in their self-identities as scientists, focusing more on the intersection between their gender, ethnicity, and self-perception as a scientist. Through qualitative analysis of short-answer questions, we were able to ascertain that working in groups in an authentic learning environment helped the students improve their communication and collaboration skills. Conclusions Students’ increased focus on gender and ethnicity suggests that they are thinking critically about how their personal identities intersect with their scientific identities. Additional research would help us better understand if the coupling of authentic learning and inclusive teaching practices have significant impacts on the formation of students’ STEM identities.


1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Horan ◽  
Chris D. Erickson

Graduates and employees of four institutions-the MOMM Cartel-dominate every science and practice organ of Division 17's governing body. Counseling psychologists from the other 60 academic programs (the OUTSIDERs) face numerous barriers to professional ascendancy. Six of 13 fellow nominees during the 1988-1989 year were MOMM members; none were rejected. Three OUTSIDERs were elected; four were rejected. Mean scholarly productivity for each group was 13, 21.3, and 19.7 Psyc LIT citations, respectively. The accepted OUTSIDERs were significantly more productive than the MOMMs; two of the four rejected OUTSIDERs ranked numbers one and two in scholarly productivity among all nominees. No relationship appeared between scholarship and fellow decisions; MOMM membership strongly predicted election to fellow status. Personal familiarity with the evaluators, rather than professional service, apparently accounts for these filings -a variant of the "Matthew Effect" discussed in the sociology-of-science literature Recommendations for reform are offered


1976 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Richard McClintock ◽  
Robert K. Merton ◽  
Lewis S. Feuer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document