Contemporary Responses to Marx’s Critique of Liberal Justice

Author(s):  
Igor Shoikhedbrod
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Moore

One of the most important and divisive issues facing heterogeneous or culturally diverse states—and most states are culturally diverse—is the relation between these different cultures and the state.This question was raised initially in contemporary liberal political philosophy in terms of the fruitful debate between liberals and communitarians. Sandel, for example, criticized Rawls’s A Theory of Justice and, by extension, all liberal theories for falsely abstracting from conceptions of the good, abstracting from culturallyspecific conceptions, and grounding his liberal principles in terms of an abstract Kantian individualism. Liberal theorists countered by complaining that communitarians falsely conceived of a single homogeneous community. Although Rawls’s revised defense of liberal justice in his 1993 book Political Liberalism does not refer directly to the liberal-communitarian debate, nevertheless, his new grounding of liberal political principles, as principles which would be acceptable to individuals with diverse conceptions of the good, seems to justify liberal principles in terms of contemporary conditions, and, at the same time, challenges the relevance of those theories which appeal to any notion of a homogeneous ‘community’.


2006 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. S. (Trevor R. S.) Allan

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Bell
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-412
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Goff

AbstractTwo recent books consider the future of trade governance. Consent and Trade proposes reforms to trade agreements so that states can consent more freely to their terms. On Trade Justice defends reforms to the World Trade Organization, arguing that multilateralism is the foundation for a “new global deal” on trade. Each book describes trade's distinctive features and proposes a principle to regulate both trade and trade governance. Consent and Trade defends a principle of respect for state consent in trade agreements. On Trade Justice offers a theory of trade justice that requires nonexploitation. Consent and nonexploitation are important principles for economic exchanges. However, trade governance and trade itself are different forms of cooperation, with different agents and different interests at stake. Consent and nonexploitation are less compelling as principles for trade governance than for trade itself. Both books understate the conflict between their principles for trade governance and liberal justice.


Author(s):  
Alan Patten

This introductory chapter sets out the book's purpose, namely to explore and evaluate the differences between culturalist and nonculturalist forms of liberalism. Are the theoretical resources supplied by the standard, nonculturalist interpretation of liberalism adequate on their own for understanding how states ought to treat their cultural minorities? Or do those resources need to be supplemented by the liberal–culturalist idea that certain minority cultural rights are, as such, a requirement of liberal justice? The main claim of the book is that we should prefer the second of these alternatives. It argues that there are basic reasons of principle for thinking that cultural minorities as such are owed specific forms of recognition and accommodation. An overview of the subsequent chapters is also presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document