A Systematic Review on E-learning Environments for Promoting Critical Thinking in Higher Education

2020 ◽  
pp. 345-362
Author(s):  
Blanca Puig ◽  
Paloma Blanco Anaya ◽  
Inés M. Bargiela
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning

Students' Attitudes towards the Use of a Virtual Learning Environment with the Presence of Advertisements: Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-173
Author(s):  
MB Mutheiwana ◽  
KL Sharp ◽  
M Motale
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
South African ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Virtual Learning ◽  
Virtual Learning Environments ◽  
Measuring Instrument ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Students Attitudes

Objective - As Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) begin to investigate how they can increase revenue and decrease costs, the Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) already implemented in most HEIs may be the solution. The opportunity for including advertisements on a VLE allows HEIs to minimise the significant financial implications associated with the development and use of a VLE, without reducing the value of the service provided. While incorporating advertisements onto VLEs makes sense financially, there is limited knowledge on how students will respond to the presence of advertisements on VLEs. Consequently, this research study reports on the findings from a pilot study conducted to determine the legitimacy and reliability of a measuring instrument being employed to investigate students' attitudes towards the use of a VLE with the presence of advertisements at a South African university of technology. Methodology/Technique - A measuring instrument, including constructs of self-efficacy, technology experience, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, pre advert presence and post advert presence on a selected VLE was employed in this research study. A six-point Likert scale, ranging from 1= strongly disagree to 6= strongly agree was used to avoid the utilisation of a seventh scale item of neither agree nor disagree. After the initial pre-testing of the questionnaire, carried out to verify face and content validity, was completed, a non-probability, convenience, judgement sample of 50 students from a South African public higher education institution situated in the Gauteng province was taken. The gathered pilot data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), Version 25.0. Findings - The findings indicate that the measuring instrument was deemed legitimate and reliable with regards to investigating students' attitudes towards the use of a VLE with the presence of advertisements. Novelty - Only one previous study has been conducted with regards to evaluating students' attitudes towards advertising on HEI VLEs, which was conducted in the UK. In addition, other studies closely related are concerned with students' attitudes towards e-learning and do not evaluate students' attitudes towards the use of a VLE with the presence of advertisements. Attitudes contribute to understanding the perceptions of students towards a VLE. Consequently, if HEIs are to incorporate advertisements on the VLEs used within HEIs, then evaluating the attitudes of the students enrolled at these HEIs, towards the use of a VLE with the presence of advertisements, is paramount. Type of Paper - Empirical. Keywords: E-learning, attitudes, virtual learning environments, advertisements, students, higher education institutions, South Africa. JEL Classification: I22, I23, M30, M31, M37 URI: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/GJBSSR/vol9.2_6.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2021.9.2(6) Pages 165 – 173

A Conceptual Framework for E-Assessment in Higher Education

2014 ◽  
pp. 652-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luís Tinoca ◽  
Alda Pereira ◽  
Isolina Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Assessment Culture ◽  
Digital Assessment ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Assessment In Higher Education ◽  
Assessment Strategies

The assessment of competences requires an approach where knowledge, abilities, and attitudes are integrated, naturally implying the resource to a variety of assessment strategies. Within this context, we have seen the emergence of what has been called by several authors, the Assessment Culture. Furthermore, Higher Education e-learning environments have also promoted the use of new e-assessment strategies. Therefore, it is important to reconsider the concept of quality assessment in Higher Education online contexts, and particularly how to develop it in the present learning landscapes. In this chapter, the authors present a new conceptual framework for digital assessment in Higher Education supported by four dimensions—authenticity, consistency, transparency, and practicability—each composed by a set of criteria, aimed at promoting the quality of the assessment strategies being used. This framework was developed based on the expansion of the concept of validity supported by edumetric qualities.

Applying E-Portfolio Evaluation Criteria to the Blackboard LMS E-Portfolio

2015 ◽  
pp. 157-185
Author(s):  
Gary F. McKenna ◽  
Gavin J. Baxter ◽  
Thomas Hainey
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Education Institution ◽  
Portfolio Evaluation ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Need To Evaluate ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Uk Higher Education ◽  
Intended Effect

An important part of educational effective practice is performing evaluations to optimise learning. Applying evaluation criteria to virtual and personal learning environments enables educators to assess whether the technologies used are producing the intended effect. As online educational technologies become more sophisticated so does the need to evaluate them. This chapter suggests that traditional educational evaluation frameworks for evaluating e-Learning are insufficient for application to LMS e-portfolios. To address this problem we have developed evaluation criteria designed to assess the usability of LMS e-portfolios used within higher education. One of the main problems with evaluating the usability of LMS e-portfolio is that there is a distinct lack of empirical evidence of evaluation criteria designed and developed for evaluating e-portfolios. This chapter describes the results of applying newly developed LMS e-portfolio evaluation criteria within one UK higher education institution.

A systematic review on critical thinking intervention studies in higher education across professional fields

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 860-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blanca Puig ◽  
Paloma Blanco-Anaya ◽  
Inés M. Bargiela ◽  
Beatriz Crujeiras-Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Intervention Studies ◽  
Professional Fields

Introducing innovative e-learning environments in higher education

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3/4/5) ◽  
pp. 337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Grigoriadou ◽  
Kyparisia Papanikolaou ◽  
Grammatiki Tsaganou ◽  
Evangelia Gouli ◽  
Agoritsa Gogoulou
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning

scholarly journals Developing Smart Learning Environments in Line with the Future Requirements of Artificial Intelligence: Saudi Universities

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Salim Alanazy
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Educational Technology ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Smart Learning ◽  
Smart Learning Environments ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Future ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
E Learning

The current study aims to develop smart learning environments in Saudi universities in line with the future requirements of artificial intelligence. To achieve this goal, a systematic review was conducted on studies published on Scopus and Google Scholar databases from 1990 until 2021 on the development of e-learning in the light of artificial intelligence (in addition to the relevant Arab studies). First, a list of challenges and opportunities for developing smart learning environments according to the future requirements of artificial intelligence was composed. Then, a questionnaire was prepared and reviewed by several academic experts in educational technology in Saudi universities. The study results include many challenges expected to be encountered in the smart learning environments in Saudi universities concerning the future preconditions for artificial intelligence. It also presented a number of opportunities and procedures for facing such challenges and exploiting the opportunities. Finally, some recommendations and suggestions were presented.

European Quality Observatory

2011 ◽  
pp. 368-375
Author(s):  
Ulf-Daniel Ehlers
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
High Quality ◽  
The Future ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Quality Learning

Quality has become a major factor for concern if e-learning should have its final breakthrough (Danish Evaluation Institute, 2003; Dondi & Moretti, 2004; Friend-Pereira, Lutz & Heerens, 2002; Frydenberg, 2002). This is the reason for the great variety of concepts and suggestions. One can regard quality more and more as a subjectively individual and collectively influential category. How should learning opportunities look like and learning environments be structured, now and in the future? How do we meet the demand for building high quality learning capacities in higher education— as an important contribution to transform our societies into learning societies?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document