Bistorta amplexicaulis (D. Don) Greene Bistorta vivipara (L.) S.F. Gray Polygonaceae

Author(s):  
Hassan Sher ◽  
Ikram Ur Rahman ◽  
Hammad Ahmad Jan ◽  
Arshad Mehmood Abbasi ◽  
Rainer W. Bussmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 391-401
Author(s):  
Hassan Sher ◽  
Ikram Ur Rahman ◽  
Hammad Ahmad Jan ◽  
Arshad Mehmood Abbasi ◽  
Rainer W. Bussmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. 1174-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Bills ◽  
E. H. Roalson ◽  
J. W. Busch ◽  
P. B. Eidesen

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendrick L. Marr ◽  
Geraldine A. Allen ◽  
Richard J. Hebda ◽  
L. J. McCormick

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
Gantuya Jargalsaikhan

In a case study, the main objective was to compare three sites with different grazing pressures in Hvitarsida, W-Iceland in relation to current vegetation, seed bank composition and the correlation between those. Our results show that there were significant difference in species composition in above and belowground, giving very little similarity in species composition between seed bank and current vegetation composition. The only exceptions were Agrostis capillaris and Bistorta vivipara that had close similarity between current aboveground vegetation and soil seed bank. Agrostis capillaris had a great abundance in all the sites and Bistorta vivipara proliferates mostly with bulbils that most likely were numerous in the soil. The results of our study agree with current theories on seed bank composition and similar studies,that the similarity between current above ground vegetation and soil seed bank depends on current dominant species (annual or perennial)and the productivity (high or low) of the site.Mongolian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Vol.13(2) 2014: 105-113


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Bjørnsgaard Aas ◽  
Carrie J Andrew ◽  
Rakel Blaalid ◽  
Unni Vik ◽  
Håvard Kauserud ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The belowground environment is heterogeneous and complex at fine spatial scales. Physical structures, biotic components and abiotic conditions create a patchwork mosaic of potential niches for microbes. Questions remain about mechanisms and patterns of community assembly belowground, including: Do fungal and bacterial communities assemble differently? How do microbes reach the roots of host plants? Within a 4 m2 plot in alpine vegetation, high throughput sequencing of the 16S (bacteria) and ITS1 (fungal) ribosomal RNA genes was used to characterise microbial community composition in roots and adjacent soil of a viviparous host plant (Bistorta vivipara). At fine spatial scales, beta-diversity patterns in belowground bacterial and fungal communities were consistent, although compositional change was greater in bacteria than fungi. Spatial structure and distance-decay relationships were also similar for bacteria and fungi, with significant spatial structure detected at <50 cm among root- but not soil-associated microbes. Recruitment of root microbes from the soil community appeared limited at this sampling and sequencing depth. Possible explanations for this include recruitment from low-abundance populations of soil microbes, active recruitment from neighbouring plants and/or vertical transmission of symbionts to new clones, suggesting varied methods of microbial community assembly for viviparous plants. Our results suggest that even at relatively small spatial scales, deterministic processes play a significant role in belowground microbial community structure and assembly.


2013 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frida Lindwall ◽  
Tage Vowles ◽  
Alf Ekblad ◽  
Robert G. Björk

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document