Village-Driven Latrines with “Engineers Without Borders USA”

Author(s):  
Joshua Knight ◽  
Melissa Montgomery ◽  
Debbie Heuckeroth ◽  
Eugene Lendzemo ◽  
David Sacco
Author(s):  
Riley Orabona Wagner ◽  
Sydney Hsu ◽  
John Nicholas Kick ◽  
Sofia Bisogno ◽  
Camille Heubner ◽  
...  

This paper analyzes the methods utilized by the Princeton University Chapter of Engineers Without Borders to ensure the sustainability of a gravity-fed water system in rural northwestern Peru. While similar small scale development projects consider sustainability in their design process, some do not recognize the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to sustainability. This team, however, is inherently interdisciplinary in nature due to its unique subteam structure, which subsequently affects its approach to sustainability. By examining the technical, social, and financial considerations of the project conducted by the Princeton University Chapter of Engineers Without Borders, this paper argues for a three-pronged approach to sustainability. As can be seen through thoughtful design parameters, strong local partnerships, and strategic financial mechanisms, the project displays promise of future success with regards to sustainability. The main objective of the Princeton Chapter of Engineers Without Borders in this partnership is to ensure that the community has the knowledge, tools, and resources necessary to maintain the water system in a self-sufficient manner at the completion of the chapter’s involvement.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (13) ◽  
pp. 4880-4897
Author(s):  
Teresa DiGenova ◽  
Bitsat Yohannes ◽  
David Hill ◽  
William P. Ball ◽  
Regina Shkylan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bowen ◽  
G. Acciaioli

This paper presents a model of development action synthesising the development arena framework with collective action theory. It shows how application of this model in the Engineers Without Borders Australia (EWB) water supply improvement and capacity building project in Tenganan, Indonesia has helped to maximise the extent to which the project practice can reflect the project rhetoric as “bottom-up” or community-inspired. The model posits a broad range of stakeholders actively engaged in development action: each stakeholder is different, with its own interests, missions, procedures, and ways of deploying power in development action. Recognising the multiplicity of subjects of development is especially crucial for improving bottom-up practice. Connections and interactions among stakeholders are inherently problematic, and must be negotiated to accomplish development work, as tensions in the dynamic among stakeholders may operate to restrict the success of these “bottom-up” development projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document