Constitutive Behavior of AA7475-T7351 at High Strain Rate and Elevated Temperatures

2021 ◽  
pp. 15-23
Author(s):  
Purnashis Chakraborty ◽  
Anoop Kumar Pandouria ◽  
M. K. Singha ◽  
Vikrant Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
High Strain Rate ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Elevated Temperatures ◽  
High Strain ◽  
Constitutive Behavior

scholarly journals Prediction of flow stress of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rate compression at elevated temperatures

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindranadh Bobbili ◽  
B. Ramakrishna ◽  
V. Madhu ◽  
A.K. Gogia
Keyword(s):  
Flow Stress ◽  
High Strain Rate ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Aluminium Alloy ◽  
Elevated Temperatures ◽  
High Strain ◽  
Strain Rate Compression

scholarly journals High Strain-Rate Compressive Properties of Carbon/Epoxy Laminated Composites – Effects of loading direction and temperature

2018 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 02011
Author(s):  
Kenji Nakai ◽  
Tsubasa Fukushima ◽  
Takashi Yokoyama ◽  
Kazuo Arakawa
Keyword(s):  
High Strain Rate ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Elevated Temperatures ◽  
High Strain ◽  
Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar ◽  
Slenderness Ratio ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Negative Temperature ◽  
Hopkinson Pressure Bar ◽  
Instron Testing Machine

The high strain-rate compressive characteristics of a cross-ply carbon/epoxy laminated composite in the three principal material directions or fibre (1-), in-plane transverse (2-) and throughthickness (3-) directions are investigated on the conventional split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) over a range of temperatures between 20 and 80 °C. A nearly 10 mm thick cross-ply carbon/epoxy composite laminate fabricated using vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VaRTM) was tested. Cylindrical specimens with a slenderness ratio (= length/diameter) of 0.5 are used in high strain-rate tests, and those with the slenderness ratios of 1.0 and 1.5 are used in low and intermediate strain-rate tests. The uniaxial compressive stress-strain curves up to failure at quasi-static and intermediate strain rates are measured on an Instron testing machine at elevated temperatures. A pair of steel rings is attached to both ends of the cylindrical specimens to prevent premature end crushing in the 1-and 2-direction tests on the Instron testing machine. It is shown that the ultimate compressive strength (or failure stress) exhibits positive strainrate effects and negative temperature ones over a strain-rate range of 10–3 to 103/s and a temperature range of 20 to 80 °C in the three principal material directions.

An Alternate Approach to SHPB Tests to Compute Johnson-Cook Material Model Constants for 97 WHA at High Strain Rates and Elevated Temperatures Using Machining Tests

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chithajalu Kiran Sagar ◽  
Amrita Priyadarshini ◽  
Amit Kumar Gupta ◽  
Tarun Kumar ◽  
Shreya Saxena
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
High Strain Rate ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Elevated Temperatures ◽  
High Strain ◽  
Optimization Technique ◽  
Material Model ◽  
Computational Techniques ◽  
Fe Model

Abstract With advances in computational techniques, numerical methods such as finite element method (FEM) are gaining much of the popularity for analysis as these substitute the expensive trial and error experimental techniques to a great extent. Consequently, selection of suitable material models and determination of precise material model constants are one of the prime concerns in FEM. This paper presents a methodology to determine the Johnson-Cook constitutive equation constants (JC constants) of 97 W Tungsten heavy alloys (WHAs) under high strain rate conditions using machining tests in conjunction with Oxley’s predictive model and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Currently, availability of the high strain rate data for 97 WHA are limited and consequently, JC constants for the same are not readily available. The overall methodology includes determination of three sets of JC constants, namely, M1 and M2 from the Split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test data available in literature by using conventional optimization technique and artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm, respectively. However, M3 is determined from machining tests using inverse identification method. To validate the identified JC constants, machining outputs (cutting forces, temperature, and shear strain) are predicted using finite element (FE) model by considering M1, M2, and M3 as input under different cutting conditions and then validated with corresponding experimental values. The predicted outputs obtained using JC constants M3 closely matched with that of the experimental ones with error percentage well within 10%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document