Microstructure and Performance Control of Copper/Stainless Steel Wire-Feeding Laser Welding Joint

Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Gu ◽  
Ziwei Cui ◽  
Jiaxu Shao
2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 241-246
Author(s):  
Y. Bar-Am ◽  
E. Klement ◽  
V. Fourman ◽  
R. Shahar

SummaryThe clinical use of stainless steel wire in veterinary orthopaedics is common, and occurs in diverse situations. One of the most common uses of stainless steel wire is the fabello-tibial suture to stabilize the cranial cruciate deficient knee (10). Numerous reports have appeared in the literature, describing biomechanical aspects of the use of stainless steel wire. The purpose of the study presented herein was to compare the strength and performance of two methods used to fasten loops of stainless steel wire: the traditional twistknot method and the crimp-clamp method. Both loopfastening methods were evaluated with two diameters of wire (1.0 mm and 1.2 mm). Both static and dynamic (cyclical) testing procedures were performed. Using a materials testing machine maximum tensile strength (load to failure), loop elongation, mode of loop failure and location of loop failure were recorded. The results of the study demonstrate that loops fastened with the crimp clamp method resulted in higher load to failure than the traditional twist knot method.


1991 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 1074-1078
Author(s):  
Richard H. Haug ◽  
Jon P. Bradrick ◽  
Marilyn Su

2013 ◽  
Vol 746 ◽  
pp. 394-399
Author(s):  
Niwat Anuwongnukroh ◽  
Yosdhorn Chuankrerkkul ◽  
Surachai Dechkunakorn ◽  
Pornkiat Churnjitapirom ◽  
Theeralaksna Suddhasthira

The archwire is generally used in fixed appliances for orthodontic treatment to correct dental malocclusion. However, it is interesting to know whether general purpose stainless steel wire could replace commercial orthodontic archwire in orthodontic practice for economic reasons. The purpose of this study was to determine the bending properties of general purpose stainless steel wire compared with commercial orthodontic stainless steel wires after forming as an archwire for orthodontic use. The samples used in this study were 90 general purpose and 45 commercial (Highland) round stainless steel wires in 0.016, 0.018, and 0.020 sizes (30 general purpose and 15 commercial wires for each size). All 15 general purpose stainless steel wires with different sizes were formed into orthodontic archwire with a Universal Testing Machine. All samples were tested (three-point bending test) for mechanical properties. The results showed no significant difference between general purpose and commercial orthodontic wires in size 0.016 for 0.1 mm offset bending force, 0.2% yield strength, and springback. Although many mechanical properties of general purpose wires differed from commercial wires, their values conformed to other previous studies within the range of clinical acceptance. In conclusion, orthodontic formed general purpose round stainless steel wires had statistically different (p <0.05) mechanical properties from commercial orthodontic stainless steel wires (Highland) but the mechanical properties were acceptable to use in orthodontic treatment.


2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.S. de Biasi ◽  
A.C.O. Ruela ◽  
C.N. Elias ◽  
O. Chevitarese

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document