Rationale Part II: A Misdiagnosis of Non-payment and Electricity Theft

Author(s):  
Njabulo Kambule ◽  
Nnamdi Nwulu
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Cherifa Boucetta ◽  
Olivier Flauzac ◽  
Bachar Salim Haggar ◽  
Abdel-Nassir Mahamat Nassour ◽  
Florent Nolot

Author(s):  
Wenjie Hu ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Jianbo Wang ◽  
Xuanwen Huang ◽  
Ziqiang Cheng

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 401
Author(s):  
Rajiv Punmiya ◽  
Sangho Choe

In the near future, it is highly expected that smart grid (SG) utilities will replace existing fixed pricing with dynamic pricing, such as time-of-use real-time tariff (ToU). In ToU, the price of electricity varies throughout the whole day based on the respective utilities’ decisions. We classify the whole day into two periods with very high and low probabilities of theft activities, termed as the “theft window” and “non-theft window”, respectively. A “smart” malicious consumer can adjust his/her theft to mostly targeting the theft window, manipulate actual usage reporting to outsmart existing theft detectors, and achieve the goal of “paying reduced tariff”. Simulation results show that existing schemes do not detect well such window-based theft activities conversely exploiting ToU strategies. In this paper, we begin by introducing the core concept of window-based theft cases, which is defined at the basis of ToU pricing as well as consumption usage. A modified extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) based machine learning (ML) technique called dynamic electricity theft detector (DETD) has been presented to detect a new type of theft cases.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
QiLin Li ◽  
ZheMin Zhang ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
Wenxing Jin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document