Mass Media Instrumentalization in Foreign Policy of States: Russian Strategic Toolset

2021 ◽  
pp. 79-106
Author(s):  
Tomáš Mareš
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Mass Media

scholarly journals Mass Media and International Relations

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-55
Author(s):  
Elias Papadopoulus
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Cold War ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
International Relations ◽  
National Interest ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Black Box ◽  
The State ◽  
Post Cold War ◽  
State Actor

In the modern theories in the science of International Relations, the traditional pillar of the school of Realism that considered the state as the only actor in the international scene, actor who took every decision in a monolithic and rational way, taking into consideration only the national interest, has now been rejected. The metaphor of the "black box", indicative of this monolithic way of operation and the rejection of every non-state, but also intra-state and out-of-state actor, even if it was valid once, has definitely been weakened by the events of the post-cold war era, and especially with the advent of globalization. New parameters have been inserted in the process of foreign policy formulation and politicians (and all those responsible for a country‘s foreign policy) have to take them into consideration.

The ways of using mass media to influence the foreign policy agenda in a democratic and non-democratic state

2017 ◽  
pp. 379-385
Author(s):  
Vitaliy Tereshchuk
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Media Use ◽  
Policy Impact ◽  
Media Influence ◽  
Policy Agenda ◽  
Media Priming ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
Mass Media Influence

In the article the ways of mass media use to influence the perception of foreign policy by domestic and foreign public are reviewed. In particular, the features of applying such methods of mass media influence on public opinion as informing, priming, and propaganda by democratic and undemocratic countries are examined. Keywords: Foreign policy, impact on public opinion, mass media, priming, propaganda

Features of the use of digital diplomacy by foreign policy agencies and international organizations

2020 ◽  
pp. 96-105
Author(s):  
O. Karpovich ◽  
G. Troyanskiy
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Digital Diplomacy

Along with traditional methods of providing information through mass media (periodicals, television and radio), digital sources are also widely used in the modern world, which, although not officially registered mass media, play no less a role in shaping public opinion. The emergence of personal blogs, «live magazines», Internet sites and social networks opened a new platform and provided new opportunities. There are actors of various sizes, from presidents of major States to Housewives, from businessmen to human rights activists. Foreign policy is one of the most popular topics.

Overseas Education: Dispelling Official Myths in Latin America

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Petras
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Latin America ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Study Abroad ◽  
Limited Access ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Overseas Education ◽  
Gender Groups ◽  
Study Abroad Program ◽  
The U.S

One of the most important contributions that the study abroad program makes is to allow students and professors to contrast official (government and mass media) versions of reality with their own observations and experiences. In many cases, there is a significant gap between what students were told before they left the U.S. and what they have learned upon their return. Not all students are able or willing to go beyond their preconceived notions, in part because of the limited access to different classes, ethnic and gender groups, or because the nature of the program limits the range of experiences to which students are exposed. Nevertheless, in my nearly forty years of travel to Latin America, I have found that most students do develop significantly different and critical views of the “official” versions of Latin America and U.S. foreign policy. The initial reactions to the contrast between preconceptions and reality vary from surprise to indignation, with many pursuing alternative and more critical paradigms. To illustrate this issue, I would like to cite several cases that I have witnessed in the field.

Biblioblogging, 'Religion', and the Manufacturing of Catastrophe

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-62
Author(s):  
James Crossley
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Previous Analysis ◽  
Us Foreign Policy ◽  
Far Right ◽  
The Mass Media

Building on a previous analysis of 'biblioblogging' and its relationship to the mass media, this article looks at the ways in which 'bibliobloggers' handled the recent tragic events in Haiti. As is typically the case in the handling of US foreign policy, biblioblogging largely fell into line with the dominant positions in the mass media on the specific problems faced in Haiti which mask or deflect colonial/postcolonial interventions. Similarly, some bibliobloggers turned to the issue of theodicy with significantly vague concepts of 'religion' and 'God' being used to both (partially) explain suffering and deflect the more troubling narratives. Finally, some consideration is given to the ideological function of loving to hate the far right, with particular reference to the ways in which Pat Robertson's comments on Haiti were discussed by bibliobloggers.

The Power of Knowledge: How Think Tanks Impact US Foreign Policy

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry G Zaytsev ◽  
Valentina V Kuskova ◽  
Alexandra Kononova
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Us Foreign Policy ◽  
Think Tanks ◽  
Nonstate Actors ◽  
Think Tank ◽  
The Public ◽  
Different Origins ◽  
Policy Proposals

Abstract Studies on foreign policy consider government as the key actor in policy formulation and implementation. Research, apparently, has devoted far less attention to impact of knowledge brokers, such as think tanks, on policy-making. How and why do think tanks influence US foreign policy? An analysis of five think tanks that differ in terms of their proximity to elites, origin, and ideology reveals two types of nonstate actors’ impact on foreign policy. Think tanks either advocate for own alternative policy proposals, solutions, and actions (“alternatives’ facilitators”), or clarify, justify, and legitimize those of the governments (“policy legitimizers”). These two roles dictate special mechanisms and think tank impact directions. In the first type, think tanks are less oriented toward mass media, but more oriented toward coalitions with nonstate actors and influence the opinions of elites. The second type is the opposite: higher orientation toward mass media and more pronounced connections with elites, and influence on the public. Different origins and strategy of think tanks may be the reasons for some observed differences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document