Client’s Quality Assessment of Digital Transaction Platforms Interactivenesses in a Covid-19 E-Commerce Business Environment

2021 ◽  
pp. 182-190
Author(s):  
Mohammed-Aminu Sanda
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Business Environment

Amalgam marginal quality assessment: a comparison of seven methods

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 496-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. GROSSMAN ◽  
J. M. MATEJKA
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment

CO 2 laser cutting of Incoloy 800 HT alloy and its quality assessment

2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.S. Yilbas ◽  
M. Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Laser Cutting ◽  
Incoloy 800

Are Psychologists Ready for Quality Assessment?

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard N. Garb
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment

Clinical Music Study Quality Assessment Scale

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Jaschke ◽  
Laura H. P. Eggermont ◽  
Sylka Uhlig ◽  
Erik J. A. Scherder
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Music Study ◽  
Study Quality Assessment

From Craft to Institution: Accounting in Italy from the Middle ages to the Early Modern Period

2012 ◽  
pp. 135-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Volkova
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
Middle Ages ◽  
Social Economic ◽  
Early Modern Period ◽  
Social Institution ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Technical Standards ◽  
Medieval Italy ◽  
Modern Period ◽  
Professional Field

The article describes the evolution of accounting from the simple registration technique to economic and social institution in medieval Italy. We used methods of institutional analysis and historical research. It is shown that the institutionalization of accounting had been completed by the XIV century, when it became a system of codified technical standards, scholar discipline and a professional field. We examine the interrelations of this process with business environment, political, social, economic and cultural factors of Italy by the XII—XVI centuries. Stages of institutionalization are outlined.

Corruption as “one‑stop‑shop”: theory and empirical analysis

2018 ◽  
pp. 32-51
Author(s):  
R. Yu. Kochnev ◽  
L. I. Polishchuk ◽  
A. Yu. Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Enterprise Performance ◽  
Double Jeopardy ◽  
One Stop ◽  
The Commons ◽  
Public Production ◽  
Performance Project ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Sector Theory

We present the comparative analysis of the impact of centralized and decentralized corruption for private sector. Theory and empirical evidence point out to a “double jeopardy” of decentralized corruption which increases the burden of corruption upon private firms and weakens the incentives of bureaucracy to provide public production inputs, such as infrastructure. These outcomes are produced by simultaneous free-riding and the tragedy of the commons effects. The empirical part of the paper utilizes data of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance project.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document