Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Upper Limb Using Ultrasound Technique

2021 ◽  
pp. 151-171
Author(s):  
Tiago da Silva Freitas
Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana B Conforto ◽  
Rafael Luccas ◽  
Isabella S Menezes ◽  
Andre G Machado ◽  
Eduardo A Mello ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 684-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bénédicte Bouche ◽  
Marie Manfiotto ◽  
Philippe Rigoard ◽  
Jean Lemarie ◽  
Véronique Dix-Neuf ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sierakowski ◽  
S.S. Jing ◽  
J. Poel ◽  
D. Elliot

Background: A small number of patients develop intractable peripheral nerve pain following injury or surgery to the upper limb that is refractory to pharmacological treatment. This study reports our results of using transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (TPNS), a non-invasive form of neuromodulation, to treat this difficult problem. Methods: Seventy-two patients were treated for intractable pain in the upper limb using this technique. Electrical current was delivered transcutaneously through a handheld probe, placed on the skin overlying the affected peripheral nerve proximal to the site of pain. Pain severity was determined before and immediately after treatment by subjective patient self-assessment using a visual analogue pain scale. Pre-post treatment changes in pain severity were analysed by Student's test for paired data. Outcome in respect of overall effectiveness of this treatment, was graded according to the maximum duration of pain relief achieved. Results: Overall, TPNS reduced pain intensity from 8.4 (SD 1.6) before treatment to 4.2 (SD 3.5) immediately after treatment, a highly significant effect ([Formula: see text]). The treatment achieved cure in 8/72 (11%) of our patients and a useful therapeutic outcome (pain relief ≥ 1 day) in 27/72 (38%). The treatment failed in 37/72 (51%). Conclusions: TPNS warrants consideration as a therapy for neuropathic pain in the upper limb after drug treatment has failed and before offering surgery or spinal root stimulation.


2020 ◽  
pp. 156918612090163
Author(s):  
Masanori Maeda ◽  
Hitoshi Mutai ◽  
Yumi Toya ◽  
Yusuke Maekawa ◽  
Takatoshi Hitai ◽  
...  

Objective Upper limb paralysis, which is a sequela of stroke, limits patients’ activities of daily living and lowers quality of life. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of peripheral nerve stimulation on hemiparetic upper limb functional recovery in chronic stroke patients undergoing low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and occupational therapy. Methods The subjects were chronic stroke patients who participated in a two-week inpatient programme including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and occupational therapy. There were two groups of patients: the peripheral nerve stimulation group (11 patients who underwent peripheral nerve stimulation) and the control group (11 patients who previously participated in the same inpatient programme but without peripheral nerve stimulation, selected via propensity score matching). The peripheral nerve stimulation group had 1 h of peripheral nerve stimulation on the median and ulnar nerves during occupational therapy. The outcome measures were the Wolf Motor Function Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and Motor Activity Log. Results Wolf Motor Function Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and Motor Activity Log showed significant improvement after the intervention in the peripheral nerve stimulation group. Particularly, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment hand score significantly improved in the peripheral nerve stimulation group compared to that in the control group (median change: 2 versus 0; p = 0.021, r = 0.49). Conclusion The combined use of peripheral nerve stimulation with occupational therapy after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may result in a better functional recovery of in hemiparetic upper limb. Peripheral nerve stimulation with stimulation above the sensory threshold and below the motor threshold is easy to combine with occupational therapy upper limb function training and is therefore clinically useful.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Stevanato ◽  
Grazia Devigili ◽  
Roberto Eleopra ◽  
Pietro Fontana ◽  
Christian Lettieri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document