New Waves in Social Psychology: Research Practices—Beyond the Disciplinary Epistemic and Academic Limits

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Raudelio Machin Suarez
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-178
Author(s):  
Jake Harwood ◽  
Karen Tracy

This Epilogue discusses the papers in the Special Issue ( JLSP 40th Anniversary) in terms of the broader field of language and social psychology. It reflects on the key terms (“language” and “social psychology”) in terms of how they intersect and the relative emphasis on each in work published in JLSP. We also present an argument for increasing the consideration of context in language and social psychology research, and we distinguish between a desire to generalize versus universalize our knowledge about language and social psychological processes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 476-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco La Barbera

The effect of communicating social psychology research findings on ingroup bias in a classroom setting has been investigated. Two hundred and twenty one high school students either read or did not read a brief report about three classical social psychological studies, then completed evaluation scales for the ingroup and the outgroup. Participants’ motivation was manipulated, and the messages were different as regards the congruency between the content and participants’ actual intergroup experience. Results showed that communication exerted a significant effect in reducing ingroup bias for participants in the high motivation/high congruency condition, that is, the communication effect was moderated by the individual’s level of motivation and the content of the arguments proposed in the report. Practical implications of results for education work and stereotype change, limitations of the study, as well as possible directions for future research are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selin Tekin Guven ◽  
John Drury

This paper uses ethnography and interviews with 15 participants who were actively involved in the campaign following the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire to address the question of how campaigners use street mobilization to seek justice in the aftermath of a disaster. Analysis of observations and themes suggests that campaigners used street mobilization to do two things. First, they used it to build solidarity with supporters through accessibility, use of shared social spaces, and collectively showing respect for losses. Second, they used it to protest in a way that challenged negative stereotypes and projected their power to the authorities, who could not ignore such a large and dignified mobilization. Whereas previous social psychology research on disaster communities focuses on the determinants of immediate responses of people who experienced a disaster, we show the strategic aspects to such disaster communities.


Author(s):  
Asako Miura ◽  
Masataka Higuchi ◽  
Yoshitsugu Fujishima ◽  
Masaki Yuki ◽  
Kai Hiraishi ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth L. Higbee ◽  
Richard J. Millard ◽  
Joseph R. Folkman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document