Hydrogeochemical Characterisation and Evaluation of Seasonal Variation in Groundwater Chemistry in Upper Panda River Basin, India

Author(s):  
Sangita Dey ◽  
N. Janardhana Raju ◽  
Prahlad Ram ◽  
Janmejoy Singh
2017 ◽  
Vol 575 ◽  
pp. 649-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.J. Rattan ◽  
J.C. Corriveau ◽  
R.B. Brua ◽  
J.M. Culp ◽  
A.G. Yates ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (11) ◽  
pp. 1542-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Eugenia Garcia ◽  
Oscar Betancourt ◽  
Edwin Cueva ◽  
Jean Remy D. Guimaraes

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukihiko Yamaguchi ◽  
Minoru Fukushima ◽  
Tadao Fujita ◽  
Akio Yamada

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Zhang ◽  
Miaomiao Du ◽  
Hongyou Jiang ◽  
Dandan Zhang ◽  
Lifeng Lin ◽  
...  

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are regarded as one of the most important sources of antibiotics in the environment.


Author(s):  
Zhonghe Zhao ◽  
Gaohuan Liu ◽  
Qingsheng Liu ◽  
Chong Huang ◽  
He Li ◽  
...  

Based on soil sampling data from the dry season and the rainy season, the spatial heterogeneity and spatial pattern of soil nutrients in the Mun River Basin, Thailand, were studied and the seasonal variation in soil nutrients was analyzed using classical statistical methods and geostatistical methods. The soil nutrient content in the Mun Basin showed moderate and strong variations, and the descending order of soil variability was as follows: available phosphorous (AP) > electric conductivity (EC) > soil organic matter (SOM) > total nitrogen (TN) > pH value in the dry season, with AP showing strong variation, and EC > AP > SOM > TN > pH in the rainy season, with EC showing strong variation. Different soil nutrients and different soil properties had different spatial variation characteristics, and their corresponding best-fitting models were also different. Based on the nugget (C0), sill (C0 + C), and range (A), spatial analysis was performed for the soil nutrients, pH, and EC in the dry season and in the rainy season. Analysis based on kriging spatial interpolation data showed that pH, SOM, TN, and EC had convex or concave distributions, whereas AP had a patchy distribution. Terrain, vegetation, and human disturbance are the main factors that contribute to the differences in the soil nutrient pattern of the Mun River Basin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document