Irrigation Methods and Water Requirements in the Nile Delta

2017 ◽  
pp. 125-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. M. El-Kilani ◽  
M. Sugita
2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-818
Author(s):  
M. Kassab ◽  
E. Moursi ◽  
M. Ibrahim

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 1618-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiaki Sugita ◽  
Akihiro Matsuno ◽  
Rushdi M. M. El-Kilani ◽  
Ahmed Abdel-Fattah ◽  
M. A. Mahmoud

HortScience ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Bryla ◽  
Jim L. Gartung ◽  
Bernadine C. Strik

A study was conducted in a new field of northern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L. ‘Elliott’) to determine the effects of different irrigation methods on growth and water requirements of uncropped plants during the first 2 years after planting. The plants were grown on mulched, raised beds and irrigated by sprinklers, microsprays, or drip at a rate of 50%, 100%, and 150% of the estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc) requirement. After 2 years, drip irrigation at 100% ETc produced the most growth among the irrigation methods with at least 42% less water than needed for maximum growth with microsprays and 56% less water than needed with sprinklers. Drip irrigation also maintained higher soil water content in the vicinity of the roots than the other methods but reduced growth when plants were over-irrigated at 150% ETc. Only 570 mm of irrigation water, or the equivalent of 1320 L per plant, was required over two seasons to reach maximum total plant dry weight with drip, whereas 980 mm or more water was needed with sprinklers and microsprays. Consequently, irrigation water use efficiency (defined as the difference in plant biomass produced under irrigated and rain-fed conditions divided by the total amount of irrigation water applied) was significantly higher with drip than with the other irrigation methods, averaging 0.41 g of total dry weight per liter of drip irrigation. In terms of both growth and water use, drip irrigation was the best and most efficient method to establish the plants.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e0301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samiha Ouda ◽  
Tahany Noreldin ◽  
Khaled Abd El-Latif

1970 ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Saifuldeen A. Salim ◽  
Isam Kudhier Hamza ◽  
Laith Farhan Jar

The present study was conducted to find out the water requirements and most suitable irrigation frequencies for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) var grown under drip irrigation. The treatments were based on the IW:CPE ratio at different empirical pan factors 0.6 , 0.8, 1.0, 1.,1.4 , and 1.6 Ef (where Ef = IW/CPE). It was observed that the irrigation interval was variable values decreased by increasing Ef value and with the progress of the growing season. The 1.2 and 1.0 IW: CPE treatments with approximately 4 days irrigation interval were achieved the best results. The total amount of applied water during Cowpea growing season was varied between 247.7 and 266.5mm with 254.8mm as a mean. Irrigation treatment with Ef1.2 was superior over the rest of other treatments in fresh seed yield (5.13 ton.hec.-1), crop water productivity (2.14 kg.m-3), biological yield (6.88 ton.hec.-1) , fresh pod yield (7.33 ton.hec.-1), weight of 100 seed (31.28gm), number of seed/pod (9.34) and netting percentage (37.1). The lowest values of the most parameters used in this study were obtained by Ef 0.6 irrigation treatment.  


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Keggin ◽  
Walter Rietveld ◽  
Mark Benson ◽  
Ted Manning ◽  
Peter Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document