Towards a Model of DNS Client Behavior

Assessing Client Behavior

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e511592014-001 ◽

2007 ◽

Author(s):

Nana Koch

Keyword(s):

Client Behavior

Download Full-text

Client Behavior System

PsycTESTS Dataset ◽

10.1037/t00827-000 ◽

1992 ◽

Author(s):

Clara E. Hill ◽

Maureen M. Corbett ◽

Bettina Kanitz ◽

Richard Lightsey ◽

Maria Gomez

Keyword(s):

Behavior System ◽

Client Behavior

Download Full-text

How Effective Is Joint Public and Private Monitoring? The Case of the AICPA Auditor Change Notification Letter

Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory ◽

10.2308/aud.2001.20.1.29 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 29-43 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Michael L. Ettredge ◽

David B. Smith ◽

Mary S. Stone

Keyword(s):

Public Organization ◽

Public And Private ◽

Private Monitoring ◽

Educational Effort ◽

Private Organization ◽

Auditor Change ◽

Client Behavior ◽

Change Notification ◽

Disclosure Requirement

The AICPA SEC Practice Section (SECPS) notification rule requires a member firm to notify its former client and the Chief Accountant of the SEC in writing within five business days of the date it determines the client-auditor relationship has ended. The rule is unique because it was developed and is enforced by a private organization (the AICPA) to assist a public organization (the SEC) in fulfilling its charge of ensuring full and timely disclosure. An SECPS educational effort to make members aware of their notification responsibilities recently ended. Our paper evaluates the effectiveness of the SECPS educational effort and the SECPS notification letter. It shows that registrant as well as auditor compliance and timeliness increased during the time the notification rule has been in effect, and that the improved registrant performance is likely due in part to improved auditor performance. One implication of our study is that a disclosure requirement auditors impose upon themselves can be effective in helping the SEC monitor client behavior.

Download Full-text

Multimodal Automatic Coding of Client Behavior in Motivational Interviewing

Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction ◽

10.1145/3382507.3418853 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Leili Tavabi ◽

Kalin Stefanov ◽

Larry Zhang ◽

Brian Borsari ◽

Joshua D. Woolley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Motivational Interviewing ◽

Client Behavior ◽

Automatic Coding

Download Full-text

Borderline Personality Disorder, Language, and Stigma

Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry ◽

10.1891/1559-4343.16.2.114 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 16 (2) ◽

pp. 114-119 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Rachel Kling

Keyword(s):

Borderline Personality Disorder ◽

Personality Disorder ◽

Personal Experience ◽

Borderline Personality ◽

Working Relationship ◽

Client Behavior ◽

The Relationship ◽

Research Studies

As many research studies show, a large portion of clinicians in the mental field hold pejorative attitudes toward those with borderline personality disorder. Oftentimes, these attitudes become manifest through the use of stigmatizing language to describe client behavior, such as “manipulative” and “attention seeking.” In this article, combining personal experience with research, I explore how stigmatizing language and attitudes affect the relationship between client and clinician and how such language impacts recovery. I offer for consideration solutions that might be more conducive to recovery and lead to a better working relationship between client and clinician.

Download Full-text

Therapeutic Social Control of People with Serious Mental Illness: An Empirical Verification and Extension of Theory

Society and Mental Health ◽

10.1177/2156869317725891 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 108-122 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Brea L. Perry ◽

Emma Frieh ◽

Eric R. Wright

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Mental Illness ◽

Social Control ◽

Serious Mental Illness ◽

Mental Health Treatment ◽

Structured Interview ◽

Ethical Challenges ◽

Therapeutic Goals ◽

Contraception Use ◽

Client Behavior

Mental health services and psychiatric professional values have shifted in the past several decades toward a model of client autonomy and informed consent, at least in principle. However, it is unclear how much has changed in practice, particularly in cases where client behavior poses ethical challenges for clinicians. Drawing on the case of clients’ sexual behavior and contraception use, we examine whether sociological theories of “soft” coercion remain relevant (e.g., therapeutic social control; Horwitz 1982) in contemporary mental health treatment settings. Using structured interview data from 98 men and women with serious mental illness (SMI), we explore client experiences of choice, coercion, and the spaces that lie in between. Patterns in our data confirm Horwitz’s (1982) theory of therapeutic social control but also suggest directions for updating and extending it. Specifically, we identify four strategies used to influence client behavior: coercion, enabling, education, and conciliation. We find that most clients’ experiences reflect elements of ambiguous or limited autonomy, wherein compliance is achieved by invoking therapeutic goals. However, women with SMI disproportionately report experiencing intense persuasion and direct use or threat of force. We argue that it is critical to consider how ostensibly noncoercive and value-free interventions nonetheless reflect the goals and norms of dominant groups.

Download Full-text

Email versus In-Person Audit Inquiry: Recent Research and Additional Survey Data

Current Issues in Auditing ◽

10.2308/ciia-52267 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. A36-A44

Author(s):

Aaron Saiewitz

Keyword(s):

Survey Data ◽

Aggressive Response ◽

Relationship Building ◽

Future Research ◽

Email Communication ◽

Audit Firms ◽

Client Relationship ◽

Client Behavior ◽

Negative Feelings ◽

Over Time

SUMMARY Recent research suggests that an auditor's choice to conduct audit inquiry via email versus in person can adversely impact both auditor and client behavior. In this study, I review recent research on this important topic, and I present additional survey-based evidence that describes how clients perceive auditor email versus in-person inquiries. I find that clients generally view auditors' in-person requests as more important and urgent than email requests, and clients feel they can more carefully craft their responses to support their company's preferred reporting position via email compared to in person. Further, clients expect that auditors will question an aggressive response more quickly in person than over email. Although audit partners have expressed concerns that email communication could impede auditor-client relationship building, I find no differences in how much clients like the auditor or in clients' willingness to work again with the auditor after receiving an email or in-person request. However, recent research suggests that email requests can lead to more negative feelings toward the auditor, which could affect the auditor-client relationship over time. I discuss implications for audit firms and provide suggestions for future research.

Download Full-text