Performance Management, Managerial Quality, and Government Performance: A Cross-Country Quantitative Analysis

Author(s):  
Shlomo Mizrahi
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe White

Performance management is tied to external forces and stakeholders whose assessment of performance is more focused on societal outcomes than purely financial outcomes. Government, corporate, and even personal performance measurement should take into account societal indicators that link these disparate yet intertwined spheres of influence. New initiatives in both government and commercial sectors are bringing greater understanding of how societal indicators can measure performance. This paper highlights how societal indicators are used to measure performance in corporate and government sectors. Corporate societal indicators are explored primarily though literary research. Government societal indicators are explored through an examination of the EPA and Superfund program. The paper demonstrates that there is synergy between corporate, government, and personal government performance measures and how business intelligence tools are making these relationships more transparent.


2011 ◽  
Vol 121-126 ◽  
pp. 1957-1960
Author(s):  
Xin Li Hu

The performance management of e-government is crucial for e-government construction which can realize the orientation function to directly influence the e-government constructing level. This paper attempts to build e-government performance management system in view of service-oriented government from micro and macro perspective, to enhance its service quality and public satisfaction. This paper defines performance management and e-government performance management system in view of service government, in this basis, build e-government performance management system in view of service government from the perspective of the macro and micro system, meanwhile in order to establish e-government performance management system comprehensively, the article finally stated the problems we should pay attention to when building performance management system. The article builds the macro model of e-government performance management system, and also built the static of five system and dynamic system of PDCA cycle system in micro-system.


2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 1964-2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J Buera ◽  
Joseph P Kaboski ◽  
Yongseok Shin

We develop a quantitative framework to explain the relationship between aggregate/sector-level total factor productivity (TFP) and financial development across countries. Financial frictions distort the allocation of capital and entrepreneurial talent across production units, adversely affecting measured productivity. In our model, sectors with larger scales of operation (e.g., manufacturing) have more financing needs, and are hence disproportionately vulnerable to financial frictions. Our quantitative analysis shows that financial frictions account for a substantial part of the observed cross-country differences in output per worker, aggregate TFP, sector-level relative productivity, and capital-to-output ratios. (JEL E23, E44, O41, O47)


2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence L. Martin ◽  
Karun K. Singh

This article describes how the private sector can utilize government performance management data to identify business opportunities. Governments around the world today are making increased use of outsourcing, performance management and performance budgeting. Utilizing readily available data that can often be accessed via the World Wide Web, private sector businesses can identify current business opportunities in terms of what services governments are outsourcing, in what amounts and at what costs. Additionally, potential future business opportunities can be identified in terms of what services governments are currently providing in-house, at what costs and with what results. Armed with this information, private sector businesses can readily identify markets for their goods and services.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
William R. DiPietro

<p>It seems logical that when a state is doing a good job with regard to the economy, infrastructure, education, and the provision of public goods, citizens will be less disenchanted with their government and less prone to either condone or engage in any form of dissident behavior requiring enhanced state repression. Given this reasoning, this paper formally proposes that state repression is negatively related to government performance, and uses cross country regression analysis to test the notion. The results of the empirical investigation provide support for the idea. Thus, it appears, just as theoretically proposed, that governments that work well, have less need to use force against their citizens, and repress less. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document