Evidence-Based Methods of Dealing with Social Difficulties in Conduct Disorder

Author(s):  
Kimberly Renk ◽  
J’Nelle Stephenson ◽  
Maria Khan ◽  
Annelise Cunningham
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Barry ◽  
Farrah N. Golmaryami ◽  
Nicole Rivera-Hudson ◽  
Paul J. Frick

Author(s):  
Kirstin Painter ◽  
Maria Scannapieco

This chapter focuses on evidence-based and promising treatments and interventions for conduct disorder (CD) and oppositional defiant disorders (ODD). Unlike some mental health problems, psychosocial and behavioral interventions are the first line of treatment for CD and ODD. Psychotropic medication is not a first-line treatment for either disorder; however, they are sometime prescribed to manage distressing symptoms or to treat co-occurring disorders. Chapter 12 presents evidence-based and promising practices aimed at the youth only, the caregiver only, or a combination. Multisystemic therapy, multidimensional treatment foster care, functional family therapy, and parent–child interaction therapy are all evidence-based treatments described. The end of the chapter returns to the case studies presented in Chapter 11 and describes the real-life outcomes followed by questions for class discussion.


2001 ◽  
Vol 179 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Fombonne ◽  
Gail Wostear ◽  
Vanessa Cooper ◽  
Richard Harrington ◽  
Michael Rutter

BackgroundStrong links exist between juvenile and adult depression, but comorbid conduct disorder may be associated with worse adult social difficulties.AimsTo test the impact of comorbid conduct disorder on social adjustment and dysfunction, suicidality and criminality of adults who had had depression as youths.MethodSubjects (n=149) assessed at the Maudsley Hospital in 1970–1983 and meeting DSM–IV criteria for major depressive disorder with (CD–MDD; n=53) or without (MDD; n=96) conduct disorder were interviewed 20 years later. Data were collected on lifetime psychiatric disorders and adult social/personality functioning. Death certificates and criminal records were obtained.ResultsThe suicide risk was 2.45%, and 44.3% of the sample had attempted suicide once in their lives. Compared with the MDD group, the CD–MDD group had higher rates of suicidal behaviours and criminal offences, and exhibited more pervasive social dysfunction.ConclusionsAdolescent depression is associated with raised risks of adult suicidality and with persistent interpersonal difficulties. Youths with CD–MDD show more severe and pervasive social dysfunction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Achenbach

Abstract. This article presents practical tools for evidence-based assessment of students’ behavioral/emotional/social difficulties and strengths in culturally sensitive ways. The assessment instruments obtain teacher, parent, and student ratings, plus observations in classrooms and other group settings, in interviews, and in testing sessions. To document differences in students’ functioning in school and other contexts, plus differences between teacher, parent, and student perspectives, users can display cross-informant comparisons of ratings of specific difficulties items. Users can also display cross-informant comparisons between bar graphs of scores on empirically derived syndromes, DSM-oriented scales, Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems. Scale scores are standardized according to norms for students’ gender and age, type of informant (teacher, parent, student), and multicultural norms. Multicultural norms are based on teacher, parent, and student ratings of population samples of students in many societies. The ratings were used to construct gender-, age-, and informant-specific norms for societies having relatively low difficulties scores, medium scores, or high scores. The assessment instruments can be used to identify students who need help and to tailor interventions to students’ needs. The same instruments can be used to measure changes by comparing pre- versus post-intervention scores. Brief instruments assess progress over short periods.


Education ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariana Krynen ◽  
Ian Lambie

Conduct disorder is defined as a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates the rights of others or in which major age-appropriate societal norms or rules are violated. Among education professionals, young people who present with these behaviors are typically described as having challenging behavior or emotional and behavioral disturbance. Without intervention, children with conduct disorder are seen to have poor long-term outcomes, including involvement with the juvenile justice system. A wide range of interventions have been developed to address conduct disorder among children and adolescents. This article focuses on the most intensive evidence-based programs available for this population. Evidence-based programs outlined include individual-focused, parent- and family-based, school-based, and multimodal interventions, as well as residential-based programs and pharmacological treatment. Given conduct disorder is a correlate of future offending, a number of resources in relation to general delinquency among children and adolescents are presented. Due to the importance of addressing comorbidity and meeting the needs of females and ethnic minorities with conduct disorder, these areas of research are also outlined. Finally, an overview of evidence-based early intervention programs for conduct disorder are provided.


Author(s):  
Kimberly Renk ◽  
Rachel Wolfe White ◽  
Samantha Scott ◽  
Melissa Middleton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document