Global Standards of Minimum Decency in Health: Social Responsibility and Health Care from a Confucian Perspective

Author(s):  
Ruiping Fan
2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Antiel ◽  
Katherine M. James ◽  
Jason S. Egginton ◽  
Robert D. Sheeler ◽  
Mark Liebow ◽  
...  

IIUC Studies ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 59-80
Author(s):  
Sayema Hoque ◽  
Tanzina Chowdhury

Cellular phone companies have occupied a significant position in the economy of Bangladesh. It has become one of the most profitable sectors as well as a big contributor to the government exchequer of this country. A great deal of economic resources is being utilized in this particular industry. Being an integral part of the society the companies operating within this industry are supposed to contribute towards social welfare through performing corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this backdrop, this study attempts to provide an overview of the CSR practices of the cellular phone companies of Bangladesh with special reference to the nature and impact of those practices. Based on the information provided in the annual reports and websites of respective companies the study has reached a conclusion that all the cellular companies except Airtel are engaged in CSR practices of some sort or other such as education, empowerment & poverty alleviation, environment, health care and others. However, there is still room for expanding CSR related activities to gain the potential benefits. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v8i0.20403 IIUC Studies Vol.8 December 2011: 59-80


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon L. Clark ◽  
Sarah McGill ◽  
Yukie Saito ◽  
Michael Viehs

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues is informally exercised by a large global institutional investor with locally embedded, geographically remote firms. This field is still a new area of research due to a scarcity of data, and because ordinarily, private engagement activities are conducted confidentially. Therefore, the paper aims to fill this gap in the literature by studying the private corporate engagement activities of a large UK-based institutional investor on ESG issues with Japanese investee firms in order to achieve a greater understanding of the under-researched area of corporate social responsibility. Design/methodology/approach – The authors employ a multi-method approach to analyse engagement activities by the institutional investor. The authors have obtained a unique data set of the institutional investor’s engagement activities. The institutional investor is UK-based, has a long history of active engagement, and is considered one of the oldest and largest specialists in responsible investment. Further, the authors have conducted several in-depth interviews with a UK-based ESG service provider as well as one of the largest Japanese trust companies. Findings – First, it is found that main target firms of engagement activities are large firms with global operations, and that corporate governance issues are the most important engagement topic in Japan. Second, in trying to effectively exercise voice across societies, engagement activities are conducted with geographically remote target firms on various ESG agendas in a self-enforcing, face-to-face, and sometimes collective manner. Finally, this study argues for the gap between the asset manager’s motivation to engage and local target firms’ readiness to respond due to corporate organisational and language issues. Originality/value – The authors contribute to social responsibility literature by focusing on the role of global investors in Japan to diffuse global standards. This area has been largely neglected in this stream of literature, despite the increasing presence of foreign investors in Japan. This is one of the first attempts to analyse a global investor’s engagement strategies with one specific country outside of the USA and Europe. Further, within the literature on shareholder engagement, this is the first paper that focuses on the means of engagement activities and the responses by target firms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-45
Author(s):  
Budd L. Hall ◽  
Baptiste Godrie ◽  
Isabel Heck

The focus of the article is on how knowledge is created, who creates knowledge, how knowledge is co-constructed, whose knowledge is excluded and how knowledge is being used to challenge inequalities and strengthen social movement capacity. This article grew from a fascinating conversation that the three of us had in Montreal in September of 2019. We decided to share our stories about knowledge and justice with a wider audience in part as a way for us to reflect further on the meaning of our initial conversation, but also to invite others into the discussion. Baptiste Godrie works in a research centre (CREMIS) affiliated  with Quebec’s health care and social services system, Isabel Heck works with the anti-poverty organization Parole d’excluEs, both affiliated to universities, and Budd Hall works at the University of Victoria and is the Co-Chair of the UNESCO Chair in Community-Based research and social responsibility in higher education.


Author(s):  
Mohsina Mukhtar ◽  
Suhail N. Bhat

Overnight, masks have become a symbol of social responsibility. Wearing a face mask is certainly not an iron-clad guarantee that a person won’t get sick. Face masks are crucial for health care providers looking after patients and are also recommended for family members who need to care for someone who is ill - ideally both the patient and caregiver should have a mask.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shlomo Mizrahi ◽  
Nissim Cohen ◽  
Eran Vigoda-Gadot

This article investigates the complex relationships between citizens’ perceptions about the government’s social responsibility, their satisfaction with public services and their trust in government institutions. It uses data from a national survey of citizens in Israel and focuses on satisfaction with health care. We build on previous bureaucratic and administrative theory, and suggest two competing models of these relationships: (1) perceptions about the government’s social responsibility are a source of citizens’ satisfaction and trust; and (2) perceptions about the government’s social responsibility are an outcome of citizens’ satisfaction and trust. Our findings demonstrate the important role of public perceptions about the government’s social responsibility, as well as the perceived performance of public health-care services, in building trust among citizens. The article also highlights the methodological challenges of determining cause and effect in research on trust.


2020 ◽  
pp. 225-240
Author(s):  
Tiffany C. H. Leung ◽  
Jacky C. K. Ho

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document