Diagnostic Overshadowing

Author(s):  
Steve Kanne
2021 ◽  
pp. 002076402110025
Author(s):  
Bárbara Almeida ◽  
Ana Samouco ◽  
Filipe Grilo ◽  
Sónia Pimenta ◽  
Ana Maria Moreira

Background: Physicians, including psychiatrists and general practitioners (GPs), have been reported as essential sources of stigma towards people diagnosed with a mental disorder (PDMDs), which constitutes an important barrier to recovery and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Therefore, psychiatrists and GPs are key populations where it is crucial to examine stigma, improve attitudes and reduce discrimination towards psychiatric patients. Aims: This study is the first to explore mental health-related stigma among Portuguese psychiatrists and GPs, examining the differences between these two specialities and assessing whether sociodemographic and professional variables are associated with stigma. Method: A cross-sectional study was performed between June 2018 and August 2019. A consecutive sample of 55 Psychiatrists and 67 GPs working in Porto (Portugal) filled a 25-item self-report questionnaire to assess their attitudes towards PDMDs in clinical practice. The instrument was designed by the authors, based on previous mental health-related stigma studies and validated scales. The questionnaire includes 12 stigma dimensions ( Autonomy, Coercion, Incompetence, Dangerousness, Permanence, Pity, Responsibility, Segregation, Labelling, Diagnostic Overshadowing, Shame and Parental Incompetence), and its total score was used to measure Overall Stigma (OS). Sample characteristics were examined using descriptive statistics, and the factors affecting stigma were assessed through regression analysis. Results: GPs exhibit significantly higher OS levels than psychiatrists, and present higher scores in the dimensions of dangerousness, parental incompetence, diagnostic overshadowing and responsibility. Besides medical speciality, several other sociodemographic variables were associated with sigma, including age, gender, having a friend with a mental disorder, professional category, agreement that Psychiatry diverges from core medicine and physician’s interest in mental health topics. Conclusions: Our data suggest that both psychiatrists and GPs hold some degree of stigmatizing attitudes towards PDMDs. Overall, these results bring new light to stigma research, and provide information to tailor anti-stigma interventions to Portuguese psychiatrists and GPs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Geiss ◽  
Jill Chamberlain ◽  
Tamsyn Weaver ◽  
Carrie McCormick ◽  
Ashley Raufer ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Many people with mental disorders in the United States remain either medically untreated or inadequately treated, which is often attributed to diagnostic overshadowing, a common occurrence across the nation in emergency departments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research is to create a tool that supports accurate assessment and distinguishing behavioral symptoms between psychiatric illness and coexisting medical conditions in the emergency department, thus leading to appropriate care and placement. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design of 133 psychiatric admissions were reviewed between the years 2011 and 2015. RESULTS: Logistic regression retained three factors: age greater than 70 years (odds ratio [OR] = 6.575, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.58-16.76), abnormal heart rate (OR = 8.48, 95% CI = 3.39-28.42), and abnormal temperature (OR = 9.82, 95% CI = 3.91-18.40). The three factors were then placed into a screening tool. The presence of each factor equaled 1 point. If the total score was greater than 2, the sensitivity of the tool was 68.7% and the specificity of the tool was 85.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Coexisting medical conditions in the psychiatric population may present as behavioral symptoms; however, the use of a tool that focuses assessment toward medical factors such as abnormal heart rate, abnormal temperature, and advanced age can direct further investigation of behavioral symptoms.


1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Garner ◽  
Douglas C. Strohmer ◽  
Cynthia A. Langford ◽  
George J. Boas

The concept of diagnostic overshadowing has historically been applied only to clients with mental retardation. The possibility that diagnostic overshadowing impacts other disability categories was explored in this study. This study examined the robustness of diagnostic overshadowing bias when applied to rehabilitation counselor judgments about clients with physical disabilities, as well clients with mental retardation. A total of 89 rehabilitation professionals were presented with a case scenario which was identical except for the specific disability condition described. The professionals then completed a questionnaire that related to diagnostic impressions and treatment recommendations. Diagnostic overshadowing was exhibited with both mental retardation and physical disabilities. However, no overshadowmg was noted for treatment recommendations.


Author(s):  
Kylie Hinde ◽  
Jonathan Mason ◽  
Lee Kannis-Dymand ◽  
Prudence Millear ◽  
Razia Sultana

BDJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-315
Author(s):  
Stacey Clough ◽  
Patricia Handley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document