Text Classification with Enriched Word Features

2018 ◽  
pp. 274-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingda Xu ◽  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Dawei Song
Keyword(s):  
Text Classification

A Brief Survey on Text Classification Using Various Machine Learning Techniques

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Padmavathi .S ◽  
M. Chidambaram
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Text Classification ◽  
Fixed Number ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Online Information ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Machine Learning Approach ◽  
Rule Based Approach

Text classification has grown into more significant in managing and organizing the text data due to tremendous growth of online information. It does classification of documents in to fixed number of predefined categories. Rule based approach and Machine learning approach are the two ways of text classification. In rule based approach, classification of documents is done based on manually defined rules. In Machine learning based approach, classification rules or classifier are defined automatically using example documents. It has higher recall and quick process. This paper shows an investigation on text classification utilizing different machine learning techniques.

Deep Learning for text in limted data settings

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pathikkumar Patel ◽  
Bhargav Lad ◽  
Jinan Fiaidhi
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Time Series ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Transfer Learning ◽  
Text Classification ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Time Series Forecasting ◽  
Text Data ◽  
Performance Levels

During the last few years, RNN models have been extensively used and they have proven to be better for sequence and text data. RNNs have achieved state-of-the-art performance levels in several applications such as text classification, sequence to sequence modelling and time series forecasting. In this article we will review different Machine Learning and Deep Learning based approaches for text data and look at the results obtained from these methods. This work also explores the use of transfer learning in NLP and how it affects the performance of models on a specific application of sentiment analysis.

scholarly journals Author identification of short texts using dependency treebanks without vocabulary

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 812-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gorman
Keyword(s):  
Text Classification ◽  
Authorship Attribution ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Ancient Greek ◽  
Combinatorial Explosion ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Author Identification ◽  
Important Addition ◽  
Digital Methods ◽  
And Control

Abstract How to classify short texts effectively remains an important question in computational stylometry. This study presents the results of an experiment involving authorship attribution of ancient Greek texts. These texts were chosen to explore the effectiveness of digital methods as a supplement to the author’s work on text classification based on traditional stylometry. Here it is crucial to avoid confounding effects of shared topic, etc. Therefore, this study attempts to identify authorship using only morpho-syntactic data without regard to specific vocabulary items. The data are taken from the dependency annotations published in the Ancient Greek and Latin Dependency Treebank. The independent variables for classification are combinations generated from the dependency label and the morphology of each word in the corpus and its dependency parent. To avoid the effects of the combinatorial explosion, only the most frequent combinations are retained as input features. The authorship classification (with thirteen classes) is done with standard algorithms—logistic regression and support vector classification. During classification, the corpus is partitioned into increasingly smaller ‘texts’. To explore and control for the possible confounding effects of, e.g. different genre and annotator, three corpora were tested: a mixed corpus of several genres of both prose and verse, a corpus of prose including oratory, history, and essay, and a corpus restricted to narrative history. Results are surprisingly good as compared to those previously published. Accuracy for fifty-word inputs is 84.2–89.6%. Thus, this approach may prove an important addition to the prevailing methods for small text classification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document