Challenges of Government Enterprise Architecture Work – Stakeholders’ Views

2008 ◽  
pp. 364-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannakaisa Isomäki ◽  
Katja Liimatainen
Keyword(s):  
Enterprise Architecture ◽  
Government Enterprise

scholarly journals Developing the indonesian government enterprise architecture framework appropriate for Indonesian government agencies

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
Asbartanov Lase ◽  
Benny Ranti
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Enterprise Architecture ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Implementation Cost ◽  
Institutional Level ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
Architecture Framework ◽  
Government Enterprise ◽  
Enterprise Architecture Framework

<span>This research was conducted to develop the Indonesian Government Enterprise Architecture (IGEA) framework which is suitable for Indonesian government agencies. Due to their complexity and expensive implementation cost, existing EA frameworks such as TOGAF and Zachman have so far not been the choice for building GEA by some countries including Australia and New Zealand. Those countries have built their own GEA namely Australia’s AGA and New Zealand’s GEA-NZ, respectively. Learning from this experience, the authors did a research to build Indonesia’s GEA or IGEA. This paper explains the research process which starts from mapping or comparing TOGAF, AGA, and GEA-NZ frameworks to get the underlying foundation for building GEA, analyzing framework artifacts, to building IGEA by adding specific Indonesian regulations and policies such as RPJMN and Nawacita. This IGEA framework is expected to become a reference for developing EA not only at institutional level but also the most important thing at national or cross institutional level, in order to increase the effectiveness of government IT spending.</span>

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF E-GOVERNMENT ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE BY PRIMARY ATTRIBUTES OF 3 ASIAN COUNTRIES

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Khakim Ghozali ◽  
Yudho Giri Sucahyo
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Enterprise Architecture ◽  
System Development ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Systems Architecture ◽  
Common Component ◽  
Business Area ◽  
The Common ◽  
Government Enterprise ◽  
Information Systems Architecture

By Waseda University International e-Government Ranking, announced in 2012 the state of Singapore and Korea ranks first and third in the implementation of e-government. Whereas Indonesia ranks 33[6]. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the implementation of e-government Enterprise Architecture in Korea, Singapore and Indonesia. Stages of the research conducted is reviewing literature on TOGAF framework, define the attribute comparison, analysis of EA implementation in each country and do a comparison of the EA of both countries. Attributes used for comparison EA are business architecture, information systems architecture and technology architecture. Korea and Singapore divide business area into two business areas, namely public services and support services. Indonesia has tthree business area. Korea split by sector information system development while Singapore users group split based information system. Indonesia has 4 main application. Korea emphasizing mobile technology and the common component. While Singapore visible effort to increase the use of middleware. Indonesian technology solutions that enable information used accessed through various devices.

scholarly journals Weighted Components of i-Government Enterprise Architecture

2017 ◽  
Vol 801 ◽  
pp. 012025
Author(s):  
E K Budiardjo ◽  
G Firmansyah ◽  
Z A Hasibuan
Keyword(s):  
Enterprise Architecture ◽  
Government Enterprise

scholarly journals Study Komparatif Enterprise Architecture pada Tiga Negara Berdasarkan Index E-Gov pada Waseda International E-Gov Rangkings

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigit Purworaharjo
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Enterprise Architecture ◽  
Government Enterprise

AbstraksPada Waseda University International e-Government Ranking, diumumkan pada tahun 2017 negara Singapura, Denmark dan USA menempati urutan pertama, kedua dan ketiga dalam implementasi e-government. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisis komparatif dari implementasi e-government Enterprise Architecture di SIngapura, Denmark dan USA berdasarkan atribut sekunder. Tahapan penelitian yang dilakukan adalah peninjauan literatur tentang kerangka kerja TOGAF, menentukan perbandingan atribut, analisis implementasi EA di masing-masing negara dan melakukan perbandingan EA dari tiga negara. Kerangka EA di Korea dan Singapura berbeda. EA di Korea lebih menekankan pada efisiensi dan kualitas layanan. EA di Singapura lebih menekankan pada kolaborasi antara pemerintah dan masyarakat. Indonesia mencoba untuk mewujudkan Indonesia Digital di mana semua kabupaten / kota akan menerapkan e-government.Kata Kunci : Comparative Study, E-Government, Enterprise Architecture, TOGAF

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document