Germán LaRA: An Autonomous Robot Platform Supported by an Educational Methodology

2012 ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
R. Francisco ◽  
C. Uribe ◽  
S. Ignacio ◽  
R. Vázquez
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Robot ◽  
Educational Methodology ◽  
Robot Platform

Integration of semantic vision techniques for an autonomous robot platform

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles M. Felps ◽  
Michael H. Fick ◽  
Keegan R. Kinkade ◽  
Jeremy Searock ◽  
Jenelle Armstrong Piepmeier
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Robot ◽  
Robot Platform

scholarly journals Study of Indoor Visual SLAM System for Semi-autonomous Robot Platform

2021 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Taek OH ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Robot ◽  
Visual Slam ◽  
Visual Landmarks ◽  
Line Segments ◽  
Plücker Coordinates ◽  
Robot Platform

This study propose the use of heterogeneous visual landmarks, points and line segments, to achieve effective cooperation in indoor SLAM environments. In order to achieve un-delayed initialization required by the bearing-only observations, the well-known inverse-depth parameterization is adopted to estimate 3D points. Similarly, to estimate 3D line segments, we present a novel parameterization based on anchored Plücker coordinates, to which extensible endpoints are added

Extended control of walking motion for use in an autonomous robot platform

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Vladareanu ◽  
Paul Schiopu ◽  
Mingcong Deng ◽  
Hongnian Yu
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Robot ◽  
Walking Motion ◽  
Robot Platform

scholarly journals Embedded out-of-distribution detection on an autonomous robot platform

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Yuhas ◽  
Yeli Feng ◽  
Daniel Jun Xian Ng ◽  
Zahra Rahiminasab ◽  
Arvind Easwaran
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Robot ◽  
Robot Platform

МЕЖДИСЦИПЛИНАРНОСТЬ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ КОНФЛИКТОЛОГОВ: СОСТОЯНИЕ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
А. И. Стребков ◽  
А. И. Мусаев
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Academic Program ◽  
Academic Programs ◽  
Full Time ◽  
The Us ◽  
Promotional Materials ◽  
Russian Universities ◽  
Educational Methodology

The present article concerns with the modern state of things of the conflict resolution specialists’ training in the US universities. The analysis is based on the informational and promotional materials which were picked up from the 11 American universities’ websites. The aim of the analysis was the examination of the four sections, which are: the orientation of the academic program, the content of the program or the scope of the skills, the main methodology of the academic program and the educational technologies. Together with the analysis of the US universities’ academic programs the article provides the comparative analysis of these programs with the Russian academic programs. On the back of this comparative analysis the authors come to the comprehensive conclusion according to which the specialists’ training in the field of the conflict resolution and peacebuilding in the US does not have significant differences from Russian ones and is carried out within one international academic trend in regard to its main features which are: the orientation, content, educational methodology and technologies. The key distinction of the Russian training from the American one is that the Russian academic tradition does have the core subject matter around which the whole academic program is being developed and which is the conflict. This subject matter is being taken in its entirety and the conflict resolution is considered as the closing stage of the conflict studies specialists’ training whereas the academic programs of the US universities embrace the conflict resolution as the subject matter of the academic training and therefores leaves beyond the scope of the training both the theory of the conflict and the forms practice of its manifestation in a number of the programs. The letter is peculiar to both short-term academic programs and the full-time two-year academic programs as it is accepted in the educational space of the Russian Federation. Furthermore, the authors of the article make up the conclusion of the coinciding major educational methodology which guides the academic programs of the American and Russian universities and which is developed on the principles of the interdisciplinarity.

Developing a Kinematic Estimation Model for a Climbing Mobile Robotic Welding System

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron T. O’Toole ◽  
Stephen L. Canfield
Keyword(s):  
Kinematic Model ◽  
Robotic Welding ◽  
Estimation Model ◽  
Mobile Platforms ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Turning Radius ◽  
Equivalence Model ◽  
Kinematic Equivalence ◽  
Welding System ◽  
Robot Platform

Skid steer tracked-based robots are popular due to their mechanical simplicity, zero-turning radius and greater traction. This architecture also has several advantages when employed by mobile platforms designed to climb and navigate ferrous surfaces, such as increased magnet density and low profile (center of gravity). However, creating a kinematic model for localization and motion control of this architecture is complicated due to the fact that tracks necessarily slip and do not roll. Such a model could be based on a heuristic representation, an experimentally-based characterization or a probabilistic form. This paper will extend an experimentally-based kinematic equivalence model to a climbing, track-based robot platform. The model will be adapted to account for the unique mobility characteristics associated with climbing. The accuracy of the model will be evaluated in several representative tasks. Application of this model to a climbing mobile robotic welding system (MRWS) is presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document