scholarly journals Registration Accuracy: How Good Is Good Enough? A Statistical Power Calculation Incorporating Image Registration Uncertainty

Author(s):  
Eli Gibson ◽  
Aaron Fenster ◽  
Aaron D. Ward
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Cazoulat ◽  
Brian M Anderson ◽  
Molly M McCulloch ◽  
Bastien Rigaud ◽  
Eugene J Koay ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian D. Buller ◽  
Derek W. Brown ◽  
Timothy A. Myers ◽  
Rena R. Jones ◽  
Mitchell J. Machiela

Abstract Background Cancer epidemiology studies require sufficient power to assess spatial relationships between exposures and cancer incidence accurately. However, methods for power calculations of spatial statistics are complicated and underdeveloped, and therefore underutilized by investigators. The spatial relative risk function, a cluster detection technique that detects spatial clusters of point-level data for two groups (e.g., cancer cases and controls, two exposure groups), is a commonly used spatial statistic but does not have a readily available power calculation for study design. Results We developed sparrpowR as an open-source R package to estimate the statistical power of the spatial relative risk function. sparrpowR generates simulated data applying user-defined parameters (e.g., sample size, locations) to detect spatial clusters with high statistical power. We present applications of sparrpowR that perform a power calculation for a study designed to detect a spatial cluster of incident cancer in relation to a point source of numerous environmental emissions. The conducted power calculations demonstrate the functionality and utility of sparrpowR to calculate the local power for spatial cluster detection. Conclusions sparrpowR improves the current capacity of investigators to calculate the statistical power of spatial clusters, which assists in designing more efficient studies. This newly developed R package addresses a critically underdeveloped gap in cancer epidemiology by estimating statistical power for a common spatial cluster detection technique.


2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (04) ◽  
pp. 367-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Morgenstern ◽  
R. Steinmeier ◽  
F. Uhlemann

Summary Objective: The registration of medical volume data sets plays an important role when different images or modalities are used during computer-assisted surgical procedures. Nevertheless, it is often questionable how robust and accurate the underlying algorithms really are. Therefore, the goal is to foster the establishment of methods for an objective evaluation. Method: To reliably calculate the accuracy of registration algorithms, a reference transformation must be known. Due to the unknown perfect registration for real clinical data, the simulation of realistic data and successive affine transformations are employed. The simulation is based on models of the respective imaging modality where the dominant physical effects are taken into account. This gives the user full control over all simulation and transformation parameters. Finally, suitable quality measures are applied which allow a systematic evaluation of image registration accuracy by comparing the known theoretical result and the transformation calculated by the algorithm under investigation. Results: During the development of a new registration algorithm, the presented method proved to be a very valuable tool for optimization and evaluation of registration accuracy, since it allows objective numerical comparison of the calculated results. Conclusions: The presented method can be used during the development of algorithms for optimization and for quantitative comparison of different registration schemes. The respective software tool can automatically generate and transform simulated but realistic data. Employing suitable numerical quality measures, an objective evaluation of registration results can be easily obtained. Still, the validity of the relatively simple models has to be verified to draw reliable conclusions with respect to real data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 3023-3031
Author(s):  
Hisamichi Takagi ◽  
Noriyuki Kadoya ◽  
Tomohiro Kajikawa ◽  
Shohei Tanaka ◽  
Yoshiki Takayama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document