Max Weber and Ludwig von Mises, and the Methodology of the Social Sciences

Author(s):  
Ricardo F. Crespo
Studia Humana ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 10-33
Author(s):  
Alan G. Futerman ◽  
Walter E. Block

Abstract The concept of Intentional Action is at the core of Praxeology, as developed by the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises. Under this unique approach, defined as the science of human action and designed to study the field of the social sciences, Mises create “action axiom”: the contention that every acting man more satisfactory state of affairs for a Austrian scholar is able to derive the fundament human action; such as value, scale of value, scarcity, abundance, profit, loss, uncertainty and causality, among others. This paper intends to present the praxeological perspective on intentional action and its epistemologic implications; it also attempts to answer objections to this thesis.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1468795X2110496
Author(s):  
Dominik Zelinsky

This paper explores the contribution of early social phenomenologists working in the 1920s and 1930s in Germany to charisma theory. Specifically, I focus on the works of Gerda Walther, Herman Schmalenbach and Aron Gurwitsch, whose work is now being re-appreciated in the field of social philosophy. Living in the interbellum German-speaking space, these authors were keenly interested in the issue of charismatic authority and leadership introduced into the social sciences by Max Weber, with whom they engaged in an indirect intellectual dialogue. I argue that their phenomenological background equipped them well to understand the intricacies of the experiential and emotional dimension of charisma, and that their insights remain valid even a century after they have been first published.


1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
John W. Petras ◽  
James E. Curtis
Keyword(s):  

1980 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lassman

AbstractTalcott Parsons and Max Weber, despite the complexities and uncertainties of the latter’s work, represent two competing approaches to the nature of sociological theory. Despite his reliance upon many aspects of the work of Weber, Parsons’ critical remarks on the problems of value-relevance and value-neutrality can be interpreted in this light. The methodological views of both theorists are tied to differing views of the development of western society and of the role of the Social Sciences. Both are haunted by the spectre of relativism.


Isis ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-619
Author(s):  
Martin Albrow
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Scaff
Keyword(s):  

IUSTITIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 85-105
Author(s):  
Fernando Salazar Silva ◽  
Santiago José Sánchez Serrano
Keyword(s):  

En el presente artículo se abordan dos autores Max Weber y Ludwig Von Mises, quienes asumen el mercado libre como un mecanismo de coordinación de las distintas valoraciones individuales. Si bien se ha insistido en una profunda separación entre ellos, a partir de sus concepciones de la acción humana, se puede rastrear, en la forma como los autores estudian los fenómenos sociales, la existencia de una conciencia para cooperar por parte de los individuos.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document