Classification and Decision Making in Forensic Sciences: the Speaker Identification Problem

1998 ◽  
pp. 647-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Speaker Identification ◽  
Identification Problem ◽  
Forensic Sciences

scholarly journals Implementasi Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Mengembangkan Mutu Pendidikan di Sekolah

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himayatul Rahmi Sikumbang ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Identification Problem ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Control Phase ◽  
Selection Decisions ◽  
Principal Decision Making ◽  
Selection Of

is the action of releasing practical, tacticaland operational actions as planning actions to beachieved, implementation strategies and problemsolving strategis, through decisions based on theresult of the selection of several alternativesolutions deciding to achieve the objectives of theschool. The strengths and weaknesses of thedecision maker are determined in the style used bythe principal. Decision making activities includeproblem identification, problem formulation, andalternative selection decisions based oncalculations and various impacts that may arise. Atthe stage of implementation of decision making,leaders in school as leaders must make manyroutine decisions to control activities in accordancewith the plans so that they can develop the qualityof education or the quality of the shcool. While inthe control phase which includes monitoring,inspection, and evaluation of the result of theimplementation carried out to evaluate theimplementation of the decision.

Rule-Based Expert System versus Novices' Heuristics: A Matching Identification Problem

1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1423-1431
Author(s):  
A. Mehrez ◽  
G. Steinberg
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Expert System ◽  
Expert Systems ◽  
Identification Problem ◽  
Search Strategies ◽  
Problem Size ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
System Versus ◽  
Encoding And Retrieval

The present study focused on encoding and retrieval of knowledge as aids to decision-making by comparing the performance of rule-based expert systems and novices' heuristics within the framework of a matching identification problem. A rule-based expert system is developed with a computerized controlled procedure to evaluate and compare its performance with search strategies employed by novices. Analysis indicated that, as problem size increased, the system's outcome compared to novices' heuristics is improved.

Forensic Science Evidence, Adversarial Criminal Proceedings, and Mainstream Scientific “Advice”

2019 ◽  
pp. 760-785
Author(s):  
Gary Edmond
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Forensic Science ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Forensic Sciences ◽  
Scientific Advice ◽  
Legal Decision ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Decision Making ◽  
Science Evidence

This chapter examines adversarial responses to forensic science evidence, with emphasis on the implicit orderliness and taken-for-granted evidentiary value of some historical (that is, pre-DNA) forensic sciences as well as the legal assumptions and practices that developed symbiotically alongside them. It first provides an overview of the main rules and procedures regulating the admission and use of expert opinion evidence in adversarial criminal proceedings before discussing the findings and recommendations of various scientific reviews. It also considers legal engagement with forensic science evidence and related scientific advice, and concludes by asking whether there are meaningful standards regulating the admission of forensic science evidence and noting the implications of this for the efficacy of traditional adversarial trial mechanisms, the fairness of proceedings, and the rectitude of legal decision-making.

scholarly journals teknik pengambilan keputusan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayu Eka Putra ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Identification Problem ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Quality Of Education ◽  
Selection Decisions ◽  
Principal Decision Making ◽  
Alternative Solutions ◽  
Selection Of

The main meaning of decision making in a school is the action of releasing practical, tactical and operational actions as planning actions to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem solving strategis, through decisions based on the result of the selection of several alternative solutions deciding to achieve the objectives of the school. The strengths and weaknesses of the decision maker are determined in the style used by the principal. Decision making activities include problem identification, problem formulation, and alternative selection decisions based on calculations and various impacts that may arise. At the stage of implementation of decision making, leaders in school as leaders must make many routine decisions to control activities in accordance with the plans so that they can develop the quality of education or the quality of the shcool. While in the control phase which includes monitoring, inspection, and evaluation of the result of the implementation carried out to evaluate the implementation of the decision.

scholarly journals Implementasi Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Mengembangkan Mutu Pendidikan di Sekolah

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himayatul Rahmi Sikumbang ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Identification Problem ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Quality Of Education ◽  
Selection Decisions ◽  
Principal Decision Making ◽  
Alternative Solutions ◽  
Selection Of

Abstrak—The main meaning of decision making in a school is the action of releasing practical, tactical and operational actions as planning actions to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem solving strategis, through decisions based on the result of the selection of several alternative solutions deciding to achieve the objectives of the school. The strengths and weaknesses of the decision maker are determined in the style used by the principal. Decision making activities include problem identification, problem formulation, and alternative selection decisions based on calculations and various impacts that may arise. At the stage of implementation of decision making, leaders in school as leaders must make many routine decisions to control activities in accordance with the plans so that they can develop the quality of education or the quality of the shcool. While in the control phase which includes monitoring, inspection, and evaluation of the result of the implementation carried out to evaluate the implementation of the decision.

Instruments for Risk Analysis as an Alternative Decision-Making Method in the Forensic Sciences

2014 ◽  
Vol 899 ◽  
pp. 556-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Kubečka ◽  
Silvie Dobiášová ◽  
Jan Fridrich ◽  
Pavel Vlček ◽  
Milan Nič
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Technical Condition ◽  
Forensic Sciences ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Alternative Method ◽  
Alternative Decision

The paper introduces an alternative method for damage pricing on buildings in consequence of defects, failures and collapses. The method operates with time-independent price of the structure and following damage on the construction. Using risk analysis methods, the price is reduced depending on technical condition to proper damage and evaluation of the object, building or structure.

scholarly journals Proses Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Mengembangkan Mutu Madrasah

Nadwa ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Herson Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Identification Problem ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Problem Identification ◽  
Control Stage ◽  
Selection Decisions ◽  
Problem Solving Strategies ◽  
Election Results

<p>The main meaning of decision-making by the headmaster is an act issuing a decision that is both tactical and operational such as planning programs to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem-solving strategies, through a decision based on the election results of several solution alternatives decided to achieve madrasah goals. The decision-making activities include<br />problem identification, problem formulation, and alternative selection decisions based on calculations and the various impacts that may arise. In the stage of decision making implementation, the headmaster of the madrasah as a leader must make many routine decisions in order to control activities in accordance with the plans. While in control stage that includes monitoring,<br />inspection, and assessment of the implementation results was performed to evaluate the implementation of the decisions.<br /><br /><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p><strong></strong><br />Hakikat pengambilan keputusan oleh kepala madrasah adalah tindakan dalam mengeluarkan keputusan yang bersifat taktis maupun operasional seperti memuat program yang ingin dicapai, strategi pelaksanaannya dan strategi pe-<br />mecahan masalah, melalui suatu keputusan yang didasarkan pada hasil pemilihan beberapa alternatif masalah yang telah ditetapkan untuk pencapaian<br />tujuan madrasah. Pembuatan keputusan tersebut mencakup kegiatan identifikasi masalah, perumusan masalah, dan pemilihan alternatif keputusan berdasarkan perhitungan dan berbagai dampak yang mungkin timbul. Dalam tahap<br />implementasi atau operasionalnya, kepala madrasah sebagai pimpinan harus membuat banyak keputusan rutin dalam rangka mengendalikan kegiatan sesuai dengan rencana dan kondisi yang berlaku. Sedangkan dalam tahap pengawasan yang mencakup pemantauan, pemeriksaan, dan penilaian terhadap<br />hasil pelaksanaan dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi pelaksanaan dari pembuatan keputusan yang telah dilakukan.<br /><br /></p>

Discarding optimality: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Reward Rate ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Standard Observer ◽  
Rate Maximization ◽  
Reward Rate Maximization ◽  
Descriptive Standard ◽  
Observer Model

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.

LPCD framework: Analytical tool or psychological model?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Bayesian Decision ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Psychological Model ◽  
Psychological Reality ◽  
Psychological Theories ◽  
Target Article ◽  
Bayesian Decision Making

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document