scholarly journals Proses Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Mengembangkan Mutu Madrasah

Nadwa ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Herson Anwar

<p>The main meaning of decision-making by the headmaster is an act issuing a decision that is both tactical and operational such as planning programs to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem-solving strategies, through a decision based on the election results of several solution alternatives decided to achieve madrasah goals. The decision-making activities include<br />problem identification, problem formulation, and alternative selection decisions based on calculations and the various impacts that may arise. In the stage of decision making implementation, the headmaster of the madrasah as a leader must make many routine decisions in order to control activities in accordance with the plans. While in control stage that includes monitoring,<br />inspection, and assessment of the implementation results was performed to evaluate the implementation of the decisions.<br /><br /><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p><strong></strong><br />Hakikat pengambilan keputusan oleh kepala madrasah adalah tindakan dalam mengeluarkan keputusan yang bersifat taktis maupun operasional seperti memuat program yang ingin dicapai, strategi pelaksanaannya dan strategi pe-<br />mecahan masalah, melalui suatu keputusan yang didasarkan pada hasil pemilihan beberapa alternatif masalah yang telah ditetapkan untuk pencapaian<br />tujuan madrasah. Pembuatan keputusan tersebut mencakup kegiatan identifikasi masalah, perumusan masalah, dan pemilihan alternatif keputusan berdasarkan perhitungan dan berbagai dampak yang mungkin timbul. Dalam tahap<br />implementasi atau operasionalnya, kepala madrasah sebagai pimpinan harus membuat banyak keputusan rutin dalam rangka mengendalikan kegiatan sesuai dengan rencana dan kondisi yang berlaku. Sedangkan dalam tahap pengawasan yang mencakup pemantauan, pemeriksaan, dan penilaian terhadap<br />hasil pelaksanaan dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi pelaksanaan dari pembuatan keputusan yang telah dilakukan.<br /><br /></p>

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal

The main meaning of decision-making is an act issuing a decision that is both tactical and operational such as planning programs to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem-solving strategies, through a decision based on the election results of several solution alternatives decided to achieve goals.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himayatul Rahmi Sikumbang ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal

is the action of releasing practical, tacticaland operational actions as planning actions to beachieved, implementation strategies and problemsolving strategis, through decisions based on theresult of the selection of several alternativesolutions deciding to achieve the objectives of theschool. The strengths and weaknesses of thedecision maker are determined in the style used bythe principal. Decision making activities includeproblem identification, problem formulation, andalternative selection decisions based oncalculations and various impacts that may arise. Atthe stage of implementation of decision making,leaders in school as leaders must make manyroutine decisions to control activities in accordancewith the plans so that they can develop the qualityof education or the quality of the shcool. While inthe control phase which includes monitoring,inspection, and evaluation of the result of theimplementation carried out to evaluate theimplementation of the decision.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal

The main meaning of decision-making is an act issuing a decision that is both tactical and operational such as planning programs to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem solving strategies, through a decision based on the election results of several solution alternatives decided to achieve goals


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayu Eka Putra ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal

The main meaning of decision making in a school is the action of releasing practical, tactical and operational actions as planning actions to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem solving strategis, through decisions based on the result of the selection of several alternative solutions deciding to achieve the objectives of the school. The strengths and weaknesses of the decision maker are determined in the style used by the principal. Decision making activities include problem identification, problem formulation, and alternative selection decisions based on calculations and various impacts that may arise. At the stage of implementation of decision making, leaders in school as leaders must make many routine decisions to control activities in accordance with the plans so that they can develop the quality of education or the quality of the shcool. While in the control phase which includes monitoring, inspection, and evaluation of the result of the implementation carried out to evaluate the implementation of the decision.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himayatul Rahmi Sikumbang ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal

Abstrak—The main meaning of decision making in a school is the action of releasing practical, tactical and operational actions as planning actions to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem solving strategis, through decisions based on the result of the selection of several alternative solutions deciding to achieve the objectives of the school. The strengths and weaknesses of the decision maker are determined in the style used by the principal. Decision making activities include problem identification, problem formulation, and alternative selection decisions based on calculations and various impacts that may arise. At the stage of implementation of decision making, leaders in school as leaders must make many routine decisions to control activities in accordance with the plans so that they can develop the quality of education or the quality of the shcool. While in the control phase which includes monitoring, inspection, and evaluation of the result of the implementation carried out to evaluate the implementation of the decision.


Author(s):  
Meng-Leong How ◽  
Chee-Kit Looi

Computational Thinking (CT) is pervasive in our daily lives and is useful for problem-solving. Decision-making is a crucial part of problem-solving. In the extant literature, problem-solving strategies in educational settings are often conveniently attributed to intuition; however, it is well documented that computer programmers might even have difficulty describing about their intuitive insights during problem-solving using natural language (such as English), and subsequently convert what has been described using words into software code. Hence, a more analytical approach using mathematical equations and descriptions of CT is offered in this paper as a potential form of rudimentary scaffolding, which might be useful to facilitators and learners of CT-related activities. In the present paper, the decision-making processes during an unplugged CT activity are delineated via Grey-based mathematical equations, which is useful for informing educators who may wish to explain to their learners about the various aspects of CT which are involved in the unplugged activity and simultaneously use these mathematical equations as scaffolds between the unplugged activity and computer code programming. This theoretical manuscript may serve as a base for learners, should the facilitator ask them to embark on a software programming activity that is closely associated to the unplugged CT activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Vitalii Epishin ◽  
Nataliya Bogacheva

Current studies of complex problem-solving do not commonly evaluate the regulatory role of such personality-based variables as tolerance for uncertainty, risk-readiness, and patterns for coping with decisional conflict. This research aims to establish the contribution of those traits into individual parameters of complex problem-solving strategies. The study was conducted on 53 healthy individuals 17 to 29 years old (M = 20.42; SD = 2.34). Our own computerized complex problem task “The Anthill” was developed for this research. We identified five measurable parameters of the participants’ problem-solving strategies: preferred orientational level (POL); orientational level variability (OLV); class quotas‘ range (R); mean and median quotas shift (MS and MeS); and abrupt changes of strategy (AC). Psychodiagnostic methods included: new questionnaire of tolerance/intolerance for uncertainty; personal decision-making factors questionnaire; Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire; Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale; Eysencks’ Impulsiveness Scale. The study showed the role of tolerance for uncertainty, risk-readiness, negative attitude toward uncertainty, and decision-making styles in the regulation of complex problem-solving strategies. Specifically, procrastination, tolerance for uncertainty, and risk-readiness were significant predictors of individual strategy indicators, such as POL, OLV, and MeS. Thus, personality traits were shown to regulate resource allocation strategies and the required level of orientation in a complex problem.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himayatul Rahmi Sikumbang ◽  
Hade Afriansyah ◽  
Rusdinal

The main meaning of decision making in a school is the action of releasing practical, tactical and operational actions as planning actions to be achieved, implementation strategies and problem solving strategis, through decisions based on the result of the selection of several alternative solutions deciding to achieve the objectives of the school. The strengths and weaknesses of the decision maker are determined in the style used by the principal. Decision making activity is the identification of an error so that problems can be formulated and decisions have an alternative which can be calculated so that are impacts arise. At the stage of implementation of decision making, leaders in school as leaders must make many routine decisions to control activities in accordance with the plans so that they can develop the quality of education or the quality of the shcool. While the control can be seen from inspection monitoring and the results of evaluating its implementation, so that we can make decisions


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-400
Author(s):  
Mardiningsih ◽  
Saib Suwilo ◽  
Herman Mawengkang ◽  
Sutarman ◽  
Marpongahtun

Community Service Activities carried out by the Service Team are intended to achieve the output target of reducing the spread of covid-19 in the people of Laut Dendang Village. The community service team conducts outreach regarding improving the quality of health and education in this village, in this case the Village Head, Hamlet Head, and PKK women become participants in this outreach, so that further all participants can socialize the issue of the importance of preventing Covid-19 and how to do it. prevention. It is hoped that the improvement of the quality of health in this village can be a lesson for the village community to understand and implement all knowledge or rules in reducing or stopping the spread of this deadly virus. This service is aimed at Community Service for the 2020 USU Lecturer Service Scheme is to solve problems together with the community through observation, problem identification, problem formulation, preparation of alternative solutions and evaluation of their implementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document