Reimplantation of Sterilized Autologous Frontal Bone Flap After Removal Because of Infection

1987 ◽  
pp. 479-480
Author(s):  
Hans Anderl ◽  
Wolfgang Mühlbauer ◽  
K. Twerdy
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 226 (5) ◽  
pp. 752-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter N. Gordon ◽  
Joe N. Kornegay ◽  
Jimmy C. Lattimer ◽  
Cristi R. Cook ◽  
TerriAnn Tucker-Warhover

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ansgar C. Cheng ◽  
David Morrison ◽  
Alvin G. Wee ◽  
Walter G. Maxymiw ◽  
Daphne Archibald

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
Kihwan Han ◽  
Woonhyeok Jeong ◽  
Jinhan Kim ◽  
Sangho Oh

Vectoring issues occur due to the dynamics of unidirectional procedure that is selected. To circumvent such difficulties, we have devised subsegmental osteotomy with distraction. In our technique, frontal bone flap was divided into 4 segments that were linked to each other by suturing wires in an 8-year-old patient with trigonocephaly. Subsegmental osteotomy and wiring of bone flap enabled us to slide bone in a more curvilinear manner and achieve natural contour. Distraction was initiated on postoperative day 7 at the rate of 1 mm/d for 20-mm gain. At the 9-year follow-up, the patient showed improved head shape and intellectual status.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 223-224
Author(s):  
D.H. Kim
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Adam Mohamad ◽  
Irfan Mohamad ◽  
Khairulzaman Adnan ◽  
Syed Yusoff Alzawawi Syed Abdul Fattah

Frontal bone fracture is a common facial bone fracture which commonly involved the outer table part. Most of the time outer table fracture is treated conservatively. However, when there is involvement of orbital wall fracture, as well as entrapment of extraocular muscle, surgical intervention via open reduction and internal fixation is needed. We described a case of outer table frontal bone fracture with left orbital roof fracture complicated with superior rectus muscle entrapment which was successfully treated via open reduction and internal fixation.International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 02 No. 03 July’18. Page : 167-169


2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e48.3-e49
Author(s):  
A Sheikh ◽  
M Schramm ◽  
P Carter ◽  
J Russell ◽  
M Liddington ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo describe our technique of using reverse frontal bone graft for FOAR for patients with metopic or coronal synostosis.DesignRetrospective analysis of digital records for operation notes and radiological images.SubjectsSince April 2014, 16 patients underwent FOAR without using orbital bar.MethodsWe plan a frontal bone graft using Marchac template and increase the angles on side by 1 cm. This graft is then reversed and supra orbital margins are drilled out. The orbital bar is then removed and drilled down to make bone dust which is then used to fill gaps on exposed dura. The reversed frontal graft is then placed in front and secured via absorbable sutures, plate and screws.ResultsAll 16 patients who underwent this technique have shown excellent cosmetic results with no complications or non healing. Removing orbital bar does not cause any cosmetic defect since orbital rims are drilled out in reverse frontal bone graft. The removed orbital bar provides an excellent source of bone dust to cover gaps on exposed dura.ConclusionsWe present our technique of FOAR without using orbital bar, which is drilled down to bone dust to fill gaps. This has shown excellent cosmetic results so far with no complications. This addresses the issue of temporal thinning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 247275122110233
Author(s):  
Rory C. O’Connor ◽  
Sead Abazi ◽  
Jehuda Soleman ◽  
Florian M. Thieringer

Introduction: Orbital roof fractures are uncommon and normally associated with high energy trauma in which multiple other injuries are present. Most can be managed non-operatively with close observation. However, in a small proportion the defect is such that it permits the development of a meningoencephalocele, which can cause exophthalmos, a reduction in visual acuity and pain, all of which are unlikely to improve without surgical treatment. In light of their scarcity and the potential of serious risks with surgery that includes meningitis and visual disturbance (or even loss), thorough planning is required so that the meningoencephalocele can be reduced safely and the orbital roof adequately reconstructed. Methods: We report a case of a patient with a frontal bone defect, orbital roof fracture and associated meningoencephalocele that presented years after being involved in a road traffic accident in another country, who complained of a significant headache and orbital pain. The use of 3D modeling to help plan the surgery, and intraoperative 3D navigation to help negotiate the anterior skull base are described along with the reconstruction of the frontal bone and orbital roof using titanium mesh contoured on the 3D model. Conclusions: Although conservative management of orbital roof fractures predominates; those that are symptomatic, have associated neurologic symptoms or pose a risk to the eyesight warrant a surgical approach. The methods of repair, which center around separating the intracranial and intraorbital contents, are described in the context of this patient and previous cases, and a treatment algorithm is proposed.


Author(s):  
Midhun Mohan ◽  
◽  
Hugo Layard Horsfall ◽  
Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla ◽  
Faith C. Robertson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke have devastating consequences and are major global public health issues. For patients that require a cerebral decompression after suffering a TBI or stroke, a decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the most commonly performed operation. However, retrospective non-randomized studies suggest that a decompressive craniotomy (DCO; also known as hinge or floating craniotomy), where a bone flap is replaced but not rigidly fixed, has comparable outcomes to DC. The primary aim of this project was to understand the current extent of usage of DC and DCO for TBI and stroke worldwide. Method A questionnaire was designed and disseminated globally via emailing lists and social media to practicing neurosurgeons between June and November 2019. Results We received 208 responses from 60 countries [40 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)]. DC is used more frequently than DCO, however, about one-quarter of respondents are using a DCO in more than 25% of their patients. The three top indications for a DCO were an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and a GCS of 9-12, ASDH with contusions and a GCS of 3-8, and ASDH with contusions and a GCS of 9-12. There were 8 DCO techniques used with the majority (60/125) loosely tying sutures to the bone flap. The majority (82%) stated that they were interested in collaborating on a randomized trial of DCO vs. DC. Conclusion Our results show that DCO is a procedure carried out for TBI and stroke, especially in LMICs, and most commonly for an ASDH. The majority of the respondents were interested in collaborating on a is a future randomized trial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document