Quasistatic Seat Belt Anchorage Analysis with Explicit Time Integration

1991 ◽  
pp. 84-96
Author(s):  
Georg Giazitzis
Keyword(s):  
Seat Belt ◽  
Time Integration ◽  
Explicit Time Integration

scholarly journals Transient load simulation of forwarder rear frame

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-96
Author(s):  
Juho Sormunen
Keyword(s):  
Time Integration ◽  
Strain Gauges ◽  
Test Machine ◽  
Reasonable Accuracy ◽  
Physical Test ◽  
Explicit Time Integration ◽  
Transient Load ◽  
Force Transducers ◽  
Load Simulation ◽  
Linear Nature

One difficulty in the design of the load bearing components of mobile machines is the transient and non-linear nature of the loads acting on them. A common method for tracking these loads is to use strain gauges and force transducers on a physical test machine. An alternative method for determining the transient loads by means of a mathematical model that intends to describe the response of a John Deere 1010E forwarder as it crosses a test track is utilized in this study. The model is based on finite element method and it is solved using explicit time integration and LS-DYNA® software. As a result of this study a model capable of replicating the real world with a reasonable accuracy was obtained. The forces acting on tires, which can be considered the most important results of this work, can be used as boundary conditions in consequent analyses, such as fatigue simulation.

scholarly journals Impact of difference between explicit and implicit second-order time integration schemes on isotropic/anisotropic steady incompressible turbulence field

2021 ◽  
Vol 2090 (1) ◽  
pp. 012145
Author(s):  
Ryuma Honda ◽  
Hiroki Suzuki ◽  
Shinsuke Mochizuki
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Energy Conservation ◽  
Integration Method ◽  
Time Integration ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Implicit Time ◽  
Explicit Time Integration ◽  
Time Integration Method ◽  
Implicit Time Integration ◽  
Time Integration Methods

Abstract This study presents the impact of the difference between the implicit and explicit time integration methods on a steady turbulent flow field. In contrast to the explicit time integration method, the implicit time integration method may produce significant kinetic energy conservation error because the widely used spatial difference method for discretizing the governing equations is explicit with respect to time. In this study, the second-order Crank-Nicolson method is used as the implicit time integration method, and the fourth-order Runge-Kutta, second-order Runge-Kutta and second-order Adams-Bashforth methods are used as explicit time integration methods. In the present study, both isotropic and anisotropic steady turbulent fields are analyzed with two values of the Reynolds number. The turbulent kinetic energy in the steady turbulent field is hardly affected by the kinetic energy conservation error. The rms values of static pressure fluctuation are significantly sensitive to the kinetic energy conservation error. These results are examined by varying the time increment value. These results are also discussed by visualizing the large scale turbulent vortex structure.

3D nonlinear MHD calculations using implicit and explicit time integration schemes

1986 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Garcia ◽  
H.R. Hicks ◽  
B.A. Carreras ◽  
L.A. Charlton ◽  
J.A. Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Time Integration ◽  
Explicit Time Integration ◽  
Integration Schemes ◽  
Time Integration Schemes ◽  
Implicit And Explicit
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document