Integrated Pest Management in Vegetables and Ornamentals in the Western United States

2004 ◽  
pp. 279-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Johnson ◽  
N. C. Toscano ◽  
J. Palumbo ◽  
H. Costa
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Western United States

Integrated Pest Management for Potatoes in the Western United States, 2nd Edition

2008 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 1039-1040
Author(s):  
Zsofia Szendrei ◽  
Larry L. Strand ◽  
first edition written by L. L. Strand ◽  
P. A. Rude
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Western United States

OBSERVATIONS ON NESTING BEHAVIOR AND TURRET CONSTRUCTION BY ODYNERUS DILECTUS (HYMENOPTERA: EUMENIDAE)

1985 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 1159-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.D. Schaber
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Nesting Behavior ◽  
Alfalfa Weevil ◽  
Hypera Postica ◽  
Provisioning Behavior ◽  
Southern Alberta

A search is being conducted to determine the indigenous parasites and predators of the alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Gyll.), in Alberta (Schaber 1981). A clearer understanding of the biology of the predator Odynerus dilectus Saussure will augment control of the alfalfa weevil in an integrated pest management program.Odynerus dilectus has been recorded in the United States (Bohart et al. 1982) and in Alberta, Canada (Strickland 1947). In California, Linsley and Michener (1942) reported that females stocked their nests with small caterpillars, but Bohart et al. (1982) reported that in Utah females of O. dilectus provisioned their nests with larvae of the alfalfa weevil. This paper summarizes data about the nesting and prey-provisioning behavior of O. dilectus in southern Alberta.

Integrated pest management and weed management in the United States and Canada

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micheal DK Owen ◽  
Hugh J Beckie ◽  
Julia Y Leeson ◽  
Jason K Norsworthy ◽  
Larry E Steckel
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
The United States

scholarly journals Southeastern Tomato Growers Adopt Integrated Pest Management

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Bauske ◽  
Geoffrey M. Zehnder ◽  
Edward J. Sikora ◽  
Joseph Kemble
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Tomato Fruit ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Fresh Market ◽  
Production Problems

Multidisciplinary integrated pest management (IPM) teams from seven states in the southeastern United States (Alabama, North Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) met to develop standards for adopting IPM in fresh-market tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) production. Teams were composed of growers, private consultants, extension personnel, and faculty. IPM practices available for use on tomatoes in the southeastern United States were identified and a survey to assess the current level of adoption of IPM practices was developed. The survey also allowed growers to identify insect, disease, and production problems; beneficial technology and research developments; and other information relevant to IPM adoption. In northern Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, and South Carolina, IPM adoption by tomato growers was classified as medium or high on >75% of the fresh-market tomato acreage surveyed. It appears these states may have met the federal mandate for IPM adoption. Tomato producers listed early blight, late blight, bacterial spot, bacterial speck, and bacterial wilt as the main disease problems; tomato fruit worm, thrips, and aphids as the primary insect problems; and poor weather conditions, government regulation, and labor as their primary production problems. Twenty-six percent of the producers throughout the region felt that the development of insect- and disease-resistant varieties would be most helpful to increase production.

An alternative way to evaluate the environmental effects of integrated pest management: Pesticide risk indicators

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Greitens ◽  
Esther Day
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Environmental Effects ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Plant Protection ◽  
The United States ◽  
Risk Indicators ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Future Research

AbstractThis study examines whether pesticide risk indicators can be used to evaluate the environmental effects of pesticide applications within integrated pest management (IPM) projects. Pesticide risk indicators, commonly used in European countries, are mathematical equations that consider data inputs such as application rates, toxicity levels of a pesticide's active ingredient, meteorological data, the soil characteristics of farm fields, and other information to generate potential risk scores for pesticide applications. These potential risk scores represent the best estimate of a pesticide's impact on the surrounding environment. This project analyzed eight pesticide risk indicators, developed throughout Europe and the United States, with two years of pesticide application data from four farms using IPM. This two-year study allowed for a determination of the validity and reliability of pesticide risk indicators. The findings reveal that only three pesticide risk indicators performed consistently and gave valid results. These indicators are: the synoptic evaluation model for plant protection agents (SYNOPS) indicator from Germany, the multi-attribute toxicity factor from the United States, and the environmental impact quotient from the United States. As a result, the authors recommend these three indicators for future research and for IPM evaluative efforts that emphasize the environmental effects of pesticides.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document