Agroforestry Systems in India: Livelihood Security & Ecosystem Services

2021 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 103933
Author(s):  
Leonardo Rodriguez ◽  
Juan Carlos Suárez ◽  
Mirjam Pulleman ◽  
Lised Guaca ◽  
Adrian Rico ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 101033
Author(s):  
Rosalien E. Jezeer ◽  
Maria J. Santos ◽  
Pita A. Verweij ◽  
René G.A. Boot ◽  
Yann Clough

Forests ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Bentrup ◽  
Jennifer Hopwood ◽  
Nancy Lee Adamson ◽  
Mace Vaughan

Agroforestry can provide ecosystem services and benefits such as soil erosion control, microclimate modification for yield enhancement, economic diversification, livestock production and well-being, and water quality protection. Through increased structural and functional diversity in agricultural landscapes, agroforestry practices can also affect ecosystem services provided by insect pollinators. A literature review was conducted to synthesize information on how temperate agroforestry systems influence insect pollinators and their pollination services with particular focus on the role of trees and shrubs. Our review indicates that agroforestry practices can provide three overarching benefits for pollinators: (1) providing habitat including foraging resources and nesting or egg-laying sites, (2) enhancing site and landscape connectivity, and (3) mitigating pesticide exposure. In some cases, agroforestry practices may contribute to unintended consequences such as becoming a sink for pollinators, where they may have increased exposure to pesticide residue that can accumulate in agroforestry practices. Although there is some scientific evidence suggesting that agroforestry practices can enhance crop pollination and yield, more research needs to be conducted on a variety of crops to verify this ecosystem service. Through a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of agroforestry practices on pollinators and their key services, we can better design agroforestry systems to provide these benefits in addition to other desired ecosystem services.


2020 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 105149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolando Cerda ◽  
Jacques Avelino ◽  
Celia A. Harvey ◽  
Christian Gary ◽  
Philippe Tixier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 902-918
Author(s):  
José Pico-Mendoza ◽  
Miryan Pinoargote ◽  
Basilio Carrasco ◽  
Ricardo Limongi Andrade

2022 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 103332
Author(s):  
Martin Notaro ◽  
Christian Gary ◽  
Jean-François Le Coq ◽  
Aurélie Metay ◽  
Bruno Rapidel

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (S1) ◽  
pp. 35-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
GENEVIEVE LAMOND ◽  
LINDSEY SANDBROOK ◽  
ANJA GASSNER ◽  
FERGUS L. SINCLAIR

SUMMARYThe extent to which coffee agroforestry systems provide ecosystem services depends on local context and management practices. There is a paucity of information about how and why farmers manage their coffee farms in the way that they do and the local knowledge that underpins this. The present research documents local agro-ecological knowledge from a coffee growing region within the vicinity of the Aberdare Forest Reserve in Central Kenya. Knowledge was acquired from over 60 coffee farmers in a purposive sample, using a knowledge-based systems approach, and tested with a stratified random sample of 125 farmers using an attribute ranking survey. Farmers had varying degrees of explanatory knowledge about how trees affected provisioning and regulating ecosystem services. Trees were described as suitable or unsuitable for growing with coffee according to tree attributes such as crown density and spread, root depth and spread, growth rate and their economic benefit. Farmers were concerned that too high a level of shade and competition for water and nutrients would decrease coffee yields, but they were also interested in diversifying production from their coffee farms to include fruits, timber, firewood and other tree products as a response to fluctuating coffee prices. A range of trees were maintained in coffee plots and along their boundaries but most were at very low abundances. Promoting tree diversity rather than focussing on one or two high value exotic species represents a change of approach for extension systems, the coffee industry and farmers alike, but is important if the coffee dominated landscapes of the region are to retain their tree species richness and the resilience this confers.


Oryx ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Davis ◽  
Mara J. Goldman

AbstractIn the search for successful community-based conservation models there has been a substantial focus on payment for ecosystem services. Such payments are measurable inputs that are often associated with conservation success. A closer look suggests a more complex, historically and culturally contingent picture. We argue that a focus on payment for ecosystem services as a defining factor for success in community conservation risks overlooking other, more significant processes. In particular, we argue for the importance of (1) tenure and livelihood security and (2) relations of trust, communication and respect. We draw on case studies from East Africa, but the findings are relevant for global community-based conservation endeavours.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document