Team Coaching in Teacher Teams

2010 ◽  
pp. 165-181
Author(s):  
Marianne van Woerkom
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110237
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Carney ◽  
W. Perry Dickinson ◽  
Jay Fetter ◽  
Eric J. Warm ◽  
Brenda Zierler ◽  
...  

Introduction/Objectives: Coaching is emerging as a form of facilitation in health professions education. Most studies focus on one-on-one coaching rather than team coaching. We assessed the experiences of interprofessional teams coached to simultaneously improve primary care residency training and interprofessional practice. Methods: This three-year exploratory mixed methods study included transformational assistance from 9 interprofessional coaches, one assigned to each of 9 interprofessional primary care teams that included family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, nursing, pharmacy and behavioral health. Coaches interacted with teams during 2 in-person training sessions, an in-person site visit, and then as requested by their teams. Surveys administered at 1 year and end study assessed the coaching relationship and process. Results: The majority of participants (82% at end of Year 1 and 76.6% at end study) agreed or strongly agreed that their coach developed a positive working relationship with their team. Participants indicated coaches helped them: (1) develop as teams, (2) stay on task, and (3) respond to local context issues, with between 54.3% and 69.2% agreeing or strongly agreeing that their coaches were helpful in these areas. Cronbach’s alpha for the 15 coaching survey items was 0.965. Challenges included aligning the coach’s expertise with the team’s needs. Conclusions: While team coaching was well received by interprofessional teams of primary care professionals undertaking educational and clinical redesign, the 3 primary care disciplines have much to learn from each other regarding how to improve inter- and intra-professional collaborative practice among clinicians and staff as well as with interprofessional learners rotating through their outpatient clinics.


2021 ◽  
pp. 003452372110315
Author(s):  
Nina Kolleck ◽  
Johannes Schuster ◽  
Ulrike Hartmann ◽  
Cornelia Gräsel

In recent years, teachers around the world have been increasingly confronted with various expectations concerning the improvement of their classroom practices and school activities. One factor widely acknowledged to facilitate school and classroom improvement is a strong collaborative culture among teachers. As such, teachers are expected to work in teacher teams, to collaborate closely with colleagues, to co-construct classroom practices, and thus to strengthen trust relationships within the team. A growing number of researchers has analyzed how teachers address these expectations. They suggest that there is a link between teachers’ embeddedness in collaboration networks and teachers’ trust relationships. The present study seeks to contribute to the research literature by presenting results of Social Network Analyses (SNA) and exponential random graph models (ERGMs) on teacher collaboration in nine secondary schools in Germany (N = 366 teachers). We investigate how the involvement of teachers in co-constructive collaboration in schools, measured by the amount of team teaching (TT), relates to teachers’ trust levels. Results of our analyses suggest that a high amount of TT is not necessarily related to a higher degree of trust among teachers at the school level. However, a high involvement of teachers in TT is related positively to their being perceived as trustworthy. Furthermore, the emergence of trust relations in teacher networks depends on general network characteristics, such as homophily, reciprocity and transitivity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 61-66
Author(s):  
Jeremy Koselak

One high-leverage strategy rooted in a strong research base — the revitalized tutoring center — provides a wealth of opportunity to students who may be otherwise underserved. This embedded, open-all-day tutoring center supports collaborative teacher teams by using peer tutors and community volunteers. By centralizing resources and providing supports during the school day, free to all students and targeted to some, the center helps schools close the opportunity gap without overburdening teachers, schedules, or budgets. One high school in Colorado that implemented the approach experienced a dramatic improvement in on-time graduation rates.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-256
Author(s):  
Merja Kärkkäinen

Artikkelin kirjoittaja kertoo väitöskirjastaan, joka käsittelee opettajatiimissä tapahtuvan opetuksen suunnittelun onnistumisen edellytyksiä ja esteitä. – Koulut ovat murrosvaiheessa ja opettajien työtapa on muuttumassa yksilöllisestä luokkahuonetyöskentelystä tiimimäisemmäksi ja verkostomaisemmaksi työtavaksi. Tiimipuheen laatu on merkittävää tiimityön ja opetuksen suunnittelun onnistumisen kannalta. Tiimin kehitys ei ole kuitenkaan lineaarista ja mitattavissa vain yhdellä ulottuvuudella. Tiimin toiminta saattaa samanaikaisesti sekä kehittyä että taantua sen toimintajärjestelmän eri elementtien osalta. – Lectio praecursoria. Merja Kärkkäinen puolusti väitöskirjaansa ”Teams os breakers of traditiona! work practices – A longitudinal study of planning and implementing curriculum units in elementary school teacher teams” Helsingin yliopiston kasvatustieteellisessä tiedekunnassa 20.8.1999 vastaväittäjänä tohtori Terttu Tuomi-Gröhn.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Thornton
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
Duncan Iraci ◽  
Berrbizne Urzelai ◽  
Georgina Dance

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document