Climate Response to Greenhouse Warming: The Role of the Ocean

1989 ◽  
pp. 435-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk Bryan
2008 ◽  
Vol 363 (1504) ◽  
pp. 2745-2754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Euan G Nisbet ◽  
R. Ellen R Nisbet

Rubisco I's specificity, which today may be almost perfectly tuned to the task of cultivating the global garden, controlled the balance of carbon gases and O 2 in the Precambrian ocean and hence, by equilibration, in the air. Control of CO 2 and O 2 by rubisco I, coupled with CH 4 from methanogens, has for the past 2.9 Ga directed the global greenhouse warming, which maintains liquid oceans and sustains microbial ecology. Both rubisco compensation controls and the danger of greenhouse runaway (e.g. glaciation) put limits on biological productivity. Rubisco may sustain the air in either of two permissible stable states: either an anoxic system with greenhouse warming supported by both high methane mixing ratios as well as carbon dioxide, or an oxygen-rich system in which CO 2 largely fulfils the role of managing greenhouse gas, and in which methane is necessarily only a trace greenhouse gas, as is N 2 O. Transition from the anoxic to the oxic state risks glaciation. CO 2 build-up during a global snowball may be an essential precursor to a CO 2 -dominated greenhouse with high levels of atmospheric O 2 . Photosynthetic and greenhouse-controlling competitions between marine algae, cyanobacteria, and terrestrial C3 and C4 plants may collectively set the CO 2  : O 2 ratio of the modern atmosphere (last few million years ago in a mainly glacial epoch), maximizing the productivity close to rubisco compensation and glacial limits.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kay ◽  
Jason Chalmers

<p>While the long-standing quest to constrain equilibrium climate sensitivity has resulted in intense scrutiny of the processes controlling idealized greenhouse warming, the processes controlling idealized greenhouse cooling have received less attention. Here, differences in the climate response to increased and decreased carbon dioxide concentrations are assessed in state-of-the-art fully coupled climate model experiments. One hundred and fifty years after an imposed instantaneous forcing change, surface global warming from a carbon dioxide doubling (abrupt-2xCO2, 2.43 K) is larger than the surface global cooling from a carbon dioxide halving (abrupt-0p5xCO2, 1.97 K). Both forcing and feedback differences explain these climate response differences. Multiple approaches show the radiative forcing for a carbon dioxide doubling is ~10% larger than for a carbon dioxide halving. In addition, radiative feedbacks are less negative in the doubling experiments than in the halving experiments. Specifically, less negative tropical shortwave cloud feedbacks and more positive subtropical cloud feedbacks lead to more greenhouse 2xCO2 warming than 0.5xCO2 greenhouse cooling. Motivated to directly isolate the influence of cloud feedbacks on these experiments, additional abrupt-2xCO2 and abrupt-0p5xCO2 experiments with disabled cloud-climate feedbacks were run. Comparison of these “cloud-locked” simulations with the original “cloud active” simulations shows cloud feedbacks help explain the nonlinear global surface temperature response to greenhouse warming and greenhouse cooling. Overall, these results demonstrate that both radiative forcing and radiative feedbacks are needed to explain differences in the surface climate response to increased and decreased carbon dioxide concentrations.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1863-1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ménégoz ◽  
Christophe Cassou ◽  
Didier Swingedouw ◽  
Yohan Ruprich-Robert ◽  
Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ineson ◽  
A. A. Scaife

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (22) ◽  
pp. 9193-9206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Blackport ◽  
Paul J. Kushner

The role of extratropical ocean warming in the coupled climate response to Arctic sea ice loss is investigated using coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model (AOGCM) and uncoupled atmospheric-only (AGCM) experiments. Coupled AOGCM experiments driven by sea ice albedo reduction and greenhouse gas–dominated radiative forcing are used to diagnose the extratropical sea surface temperature (SST) response to sea ice loss. Sea ice loss is then imposed in AGCM experiments both with and without these extratropical SST changes, which are found to extend beyond the regions where sea ice is lost. Sea ice loss in isolation drives warming that is confined to the Arctic lower troposphere and only a weak atmospheric circulation response. When the extratropical SST response caused by sea ice loss is also included in the forcing, the warming extends into the Arctic midtroposphere during winter. This coincides with a stronger atmospheric circulation response, including an equatorward shift in the eddy-driven jet, a deepening of the Aleutian low, and an expansion of the Siberian high. Similar results are found whether the extratropical SST forcing is taken directly from the AOGCM driven by sea ice loss, or whether they are diagnosed using a two-parameter pattern scaling technique where tropical adjustment to sea ice loss is removed. These results suggest that AGCM experiments that are driven by sea ice loss and only local SST increases will underestimate the Arctic midtroposphere warming and atmospheric circulation response to sea ice loss, compared to AOGCM simulations and the real world.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1602-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Zanchettin ◽  
Claudia Timmreck ◽  
Matthew Toohey ◽  
Johann H. Jungclaus ◽  
Matthias Bittner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document