Microfossil Sample Contamination and Reliability Problems

Author(s):  
Owen R. Green
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Whitty ◽  
John F. Thompson

AbstractBackgroundLow levels of sample contamination can have disastrous effects on the accurate identification of somatic variation in tumor samples. Detection of sample contamination in DNA is generally based on observation of low frequency variants that suggest more than a single source of DNA is present. This strategy works with standard DNA samples but is especially problematic in solid tumor FFPE samples because there can be huge variations in allele frequency (AF) due to massive copy number changes arising from large gains and losses across the genome. The tremendously variable allele frequencies make detection of contamination challenging. A method not based on individual AF is needed for accurate determination of whether a sample is contaminated and to what degree.MethodsWe used microhaplotypes to determine whether sample contamination is present. Microhaplotypes are sets of variants on the same sequencing read that can be unambiguously phased. Instead of measuring AF, the number and frequency of microhaplotypes is determined. Contamination detection becomes based on fundamental genomic properties, linkage disequilibrium (LD) and the diploid nature of human DNA, rather than variant frequencies. We optimized microhaplotype content based on 164 single nucleotide variant sets located in genes already sequenced within a cancer panel. Thus, contamination detection uses existing sequence data and does not require sequencing of any extraneous regions. The content is chosen based on LD data from the 1000 Genomes Project to be ancestry agnostic, providing the same sensitivity for contamination detection with samples from individuals of African, East Asian, and European ancestry.ResultsDetection of contamination at 1% and below is possible using this design. The methods described here can also be extended to other DNA mixtures such as forensic and non-invasive prenatal testing samples where DNA mixes of 1% or less can be similarly detected.ConclusionsThe microhaplotype method allows sensitive detection of DNA contamination in FFPE tumor samples. These methods provide a foundation for examining DNA mixtures in a variety of contexts. With the appropriate panels and high sequencing depth, low levels of secondary DNA can be detected and this can be valuable in a variety of applications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Rostyslav Sipakov

The main factors of air pollution in large cities in Ukraine are described in the article and the main factors of smog have been analyzed on the example of Kyiv in the period January - February 2017. For the analysis of sample contamination points in Kyiv, we used a mathematical model of the spread of solid and gaseous pollutants with the main factors of influence on the scattering process of contaminants in the air: heat, turbulence, chemical kinetics, etc. As a result of the simulation it was confirmed that the smog in Kyiv and surroundings was formed as a result of anticyclone and air pollution by harmful substances, soot and etc.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (S235) ◽  
pp. 406-407
Author(s):  
Kazuaki Ota

AbstractWe discovered 30 candidate galaxies are clustering in a small ~200 Mpc2 region at z = 6 with 5σ local density excess in a wide 876 arcmin2 field. Four of them were spectroscopically identified as z = 5.9–6.0 Lyα emitters (~34 Mpc in line-of-sight). This structure is comparable to z = 4.8 and 5.7 galaxy proto-clusters previously found. Since the other candidates are likely to be real galaxies due to low sample contamination, the overdensity can be a z~6 proto-cluster.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Donahue ◽  
T W Linick ◽  
A J T Jull

We present here the method we use to convert to radiocarbon ages (14C/13C) ratios measured in the Arizona Accelerator Mass Spectrometer facility. We describe the procedures we use to convert sample and standard isotope ratios to values appropriate for calculation of radiocarbon ages. We also discuss, in some detail, corrections to account for sample contamination.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-636
Author(s):  
Masumi MATSUMURA ◽  
Kimikazu SASA ◽  
Tetsuya MATSUNAKA ◽  
Keisuke SUEKI ◽  
Tsutomu TAKAHASHI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document