Introduction. The methodical-methodological ambivalence of Analytical Philosophy of Language pervading the three phases of its historical development

1967 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Karl-Otto Apel
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Analytical Philosophy ◽  
Three Phases

Analytical Philosophy of Language and Aesthetics—A Survey

1982 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-41
Author(s):  
Uwe Multhaup ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Analytical Philosophy

Legal positivism and the philosophy of language: a critique of H.L.A. Hart's ‘Descriptive Sociology’

Legal Studies ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Edgeworth
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Law And Society ◽  
Legal Philosophy ◽  
Analytical Philosophy

Some years ago, a state-of-play review of the study of Law and Society in Britain by Colin Campbell and Paul Wiles contained the almost rueful comment that ‘analytical jurisprudence and legal positivism… have proved of intimidating endurance as archetypes. As another commentator, Peter Goodrich, has noted recently, Neil MacCormick, one leading authority in the field, rejoined that ‘to confirm or confute these accounts it is necessary to take up some position in analytical philosophy and the philosophy of language. Goodrich's review of linguistics and contemporary legal philosophy indicated that this gauntlet has not been systematically taken up either by legal philosophers or even by those sociologists of law who have been most critical of the general features of legal positivism and the substantive theories legal positivists have themselves proposed.

scholarly journals Bahasa dan Kekuasaan dalam Historiografi Islam Marshall G.S. Hodgson

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-70
Author(s):  
Greg Soetomo
Keyword(s):  
Social Structure ◽  
Michel Foucault ◽  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Philosophy Of History ◽  
Analytical Philosophy ◽  
History Of Knowledge ◽  
The Social ◽  
History Of ◽  
Archaeology Of Knowledge ◽  
Developing System

Historian has been preserving a historical unity and continuity as a truth. There is an assumption that history has a ‘constant’. This paper explains and proves otherwise. This writing understands history is in fact filled with various ruptures, differences, and deviations. This uncertainty has taken place when ‘language’ becomes a focus of the study of history. In his L’Archeologie du savoir (1969), Michel Foucault (1926-1984) rejected the preconception of history as unity and continuity. He believed the history as a journey with various ruptures, differences, and irregularities that reveal uncertainty. This reversal has taken place when language as the focus’ study in the history of knowledge. Foucault has called this method as the Archaeology of Knowledge. This is the question which this paper is going to respond: “How does Michel Foucault’s archaeology of knowledge, the analytical philosophy of language, elucidate the diversity within Marshall G.S. Hodgson’s history of Islam?” These three below mentioned questions respectively reflect a three-fold dimension of the  diversity in Foucault’s thoughts as explained in his  L’Archeologie du savoir (poststructuralism-structuralism, postmodernism, and philosophy of history). First, how does Hodgson, as a structuralist, write the history of Islam by way of developing system of discourses to reveal meaning; at the same time, as a poststructuralist, he reveals incoherence of discourses and its plurality of meanings? Second, how do we understand that the social structure in the history cannot be simply detached from the chains of power as a constitutive dimension of discourse? Third, how do we comprehend, that in every stages of history, they have its distinctive episteme and diversity of thoughts that support the formation of discourses? This research is essentially to explain the three perspectives of Foucault’s philosophy. At the same time, the three approaches in Hodgson’s writing on the history of Islam are also being explored. Both points of convergence and of divergence have become the whole study of this paper.  

Philosophy and the Lyric

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lamarque
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Speech Act ◽  
Lyric Poetry ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Speech Act Theory ◽  
Truth Conditions ◽  
Analytical Philosophy ◽  
Basic Assumptions ◽  
Theories Of Meaning ◽  
Linguistic Usage

AbstractThe paper surveys and comments on some of the issues that arise about the lyric in philosophical, principally analytical, aesthetics. In brief these are: definition, expression, paraphrase, form-content unity, experience, and truth and profundity. The paper shows in each case why these issues are important from the perspective of analytical philosophy but also why lyric poetry is not always an easy subject matter to accommodate to standard analytical presuppositions. It might be thought that theories of meaning within philosophy of language (be it semantics, speech act theory or truth-conditions) should be applicable to a full range of linguistic usage. But lyric poetry confounds that expectation and yields a context where familiar models of meaning and communication can seem inadequate. Yet analytical philosophers should not simply dismiss poetry as somehow exceptional or aberrant but would gain from looking afresh at basic assumptions to see how their views about language might be broadened and modified.

Traditional and Analytical Philosophy: Lectures on the Philosophy of Language.

1985 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 720
Author(s):  
Richard Rorty ◽  
Ernst Tugendhat ◽  
P. A. Gorner
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Analytical Philosophy

Oppression and Resistance: Frye's Politics of Reality

Hypatia ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Card
Keyword(s):  
Feminist Theory ◽  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Gay Rights ◽  
Outstanding Contribution ◽  
Analytical Philosophy ◽  
White Racism ◽  
Its Analysis ◽  
Positive Message ◽  
Problematic Aspect ◽  
Drag Queens

Marilyn Frye's first book, The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory, presents nine philosophical lectures: four on women's subordination, four on resistance and rebellion, one on revolution. Its approach combines a lesbian perspective with analytical philosophy of language. The major contributions of the book are its analysis of oppression, highly suggestive discussions of the roles of attention in knowledge and ignorance and in arrogance and love, a defense of political separatism not based on female supremacism, and a development of the idea of lesbian epistemology. Its proposal for resisting White racism will be controversial. Its treatment of gay rights is not balanced by an acknowledgement that drag queens, like “totaled women,” are products of oppression, not simply of intolerance. The most philosophically problematic aspect of the book is its analysis of coercion and of the roles of coercion in women's subordination. This creates an unresolved tension with the positive message of the second half of the book. Despite this difficulty, these essays are an outstanding contribution to contemporary feminist theory.

Naming “World Christianity”: Historical and Personal Perspectives on the Yale-Edinburgh Conference in World Christianity and Mission History

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-128
Author(s):  
Dana L. Robert
Keyword(s):  
Special Reference ◽  
North American ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Academic Discourse ◽  
Keynote Address ◽  
Field Of Study ◽  
Mission History ◽  
World Christianity ◽  
Academic Discourses ◽  
Three Phases

This article was originally delivered as the keynote address at the 2019 Yale-Edinburgh Conference on mission history. It charts three phases in the historical development of the interlocking academic discourses of mission studies and World Christianity, with special reference to their context in North American mainline Protestant academia since 1910. It further focuses on the provenance of the Yale-Edinburgh Conference and argues for its importance in the naming of World Christianity as a field of study. The author reflects on her own experiences in the emergence of World Christianity as a contemporary academic discourse.

scholarly journals Aliran-Aliran Filsafat Barat Kontemporer (Postmodernisme)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-99
Author(s):  
Lailatul Maskhuroh
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Contemporary Philosophy ◽  
Analytical Philosophy ◽  
Philosophy Of Life ◽  
Life Attitudes ◽  
Different Characteristics ◽  
Development Methods ◽  
Language Meaning

Philosophy in the contemporary era has different characteristics from the previous era. Some of its characteristics, namely departing from humans who live in this age are very careful in following scientific development methods as well as examining language, meaning, symbols and emotions, human life attitudes. Technology dominates in this era so that many philosophers who are realists and the human soul experience emptiness. It can be said that the distinctive feature of this contemporary philosophy is that it does not have a flow form but continues to conduct studies and propose solutions that are continuously updated, a school of philosophy emerged in the postmodernism era, namely phenomenology and existentialism, analytical philosophy and philosophy of language, critical philosophy, postmodernism, while those which are used as a discussion in the era of Western contemporary philosophy and its surroundings, namely logical positivism, neomarxism, pragmatism, Neo-kantianism, phenomenology and existentialism, philosophy of life, postmodernism, contemporary atheism, hermeneutics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document