Changing Practices, Changing Values?: A Bernsteinian Analysis of Knowledge Production and Knowledge Exchange in Two UK Universities

2016 ◽  
pp. 201-222
Author(s):  
Brenda Little ◽  
Andrea Abbas ◽  
Mala Singh
2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-100
Author(s):  
Merle Jacob

The combination of decreasing public allocations to universities with relevance pressure from both governments and private corporations has contributed to the rise of the phenomenon of Mode 2 knowledge production. Many Mode 2 researchers have been encouraged and stimulated to experiment with new forms of organizing the production of knowledge while remaining within the context of the traditional European university. This has resulted in the emergence of number of new institutional formats including university based research centers or institutes and long-term research programs have emerged. While there has been a lively debate about the transitions in the landscape of knowledge production, it has failed to address its organizational details. A detailed look at transition cases pushed forward by political programs promoting knowledge exchange between university and industry shows that the institutionalization of Mode 2 is accompanied by significant problems for the management of research and the production of knowledge.


2015 ◽  
Vol IV Série (Nº 6) ◽  
pp. 35-43
Author(s):  
Leonel Preto ◽  
Matilde Martins ◽  
Manuel Brás ◽  
Maria Pimentel ◽  
Cayetano Fernández-Sola

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Nascimbeni

The paper is presenting some considerations on how knowledge is collaboratively created and documented in social networks within International Development Cooperation (IDC) settings, and on the importance of collaborative knowledge production and exploitation within these networks. We argue that knowledge exchange and creation is one of the main added values of networking activities of IDC in the network society, and we advocate for networking to be considered a fundamental component of IDC interventions. A specific case study is presented, showing the impact of collaborative knowledge building on a Europe-Latin America cooperation programme of the European Commission.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 18537-18551
Author(s):  
Madson de Santana Santos ◽  
Alfrancio Ferreira Dias ◽  
Ivanderson Pereira Silva ◽  
Pedro Paulo Souza Rios ◽  
Anselmo Lima Oliveira

Politik ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Marcus Kristensen ◽  
Ras Tind Nielsen

This article maps the emergence and development of Chinese discourses about China’s rise in international politics. It examines how the production of knowledge, particularly theories on international relations and grand strategy, develop in their travels between the scienti c and political as well as the international and national. Taking its point of departure in the sociology of science, the article sets out to understand the interplay between social, political, and intellectual conditions for knowledge production in today’s Interna- tional Relations (IR) research in China. Contrary to the conventional notion that Chinese social science is determined by political preferences, the paper argues 1) that the ideal of (pure) science and (dirty) politics as two separate spheres is di cult to sustain in the empirical analysis of knowledge production (in China and elsewhere) and 2) that more often than not important policy ideas and theories, such ‘Peaceful Rise’, the ‘Chinese School’ or ‘Harmonious World’ have emerged from a productive relationship between science and politics. e analysis of Chinese IR discourse shows that Chinese scholars and experts might play a more in uential role in the formulation of foreign policy concepts than usually assumed. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document