scholarly journals Hollywood experts: A field analysis of knowledge production in American entertainment television

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 939-951
Author(s):  
Arsenii Khitrov
2015 ◽  
Vol IV Série (Nº 6) ◽  
pp. 35-43
Author(s):  
Leonel Preto ◽  
Matilde Martins ◽  
Manuel Brás ◽  
Maria Pimentel ◽  
Cayetano Fernández-Sola

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 18537-18551
Author(s):  
Madson de Santana Santos ◽  
Alfrancio Ferreira Dias ◽  
Ivanderson Pereira Silva ◽  
Pedro Paulo Souza Rios ◽  
Anselmo Lima Oliveira

Politik ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Marcus Kristensen ◽  
Ras Tind Nielsen

This article maps the emergence and development of Chinese discourses about China’s rise in international politics. It examines how the production of knowledge, particularly theories on international relations and grand strategy, develop in their travels between the scienti c and political as well as the international and national. Taking its point of departure in the sociology of science, the article sets out to understand the interplay between social, political, and intellectual conditions for knowledge production in today’s Interna- tional Relations (IR) research in China. Contrary to the conventional notion that Chinese social science is determined by political preferences, the paper argues 1) that the ideal of (pure) science and (dirty) politics as two separate spheres is di cult to sustain in the empirical analysis of knowledge production (in China and elsewhere) and 2) that more often than not important policy ideas and theories, such ‘Peaceful Rise’, the ‘Chinese School’ or ‘Harmonious World’ have emerged from a productive relationship between science and politics. e analysis of Chinese IR discourse shows that Chinese scholars and experts might play a more in uential role in the formulation of foreign policy concepts than usually assumed. 


2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-72
Author(s):  
Wolgang Zierhofer ◽  
Paul Burger

Within the discourse promoting transdisciplinary research (TDR), also referred to as Mode 2 science, it is often claimed that scientifically coping with urgent life-world problems calls for interdisciplinary participatory research (or TDR), and that this represents a new mode of knowledge production. Although we look upon TDR as a fertile innovation, we have epistemological and methodological concerns in treating TDR as a (singular) new mode of knowledge production. Hence, our paper attempts to contribute to clarifying the meaning of TDR from an epistemological and methodological perspective. We develop a conceptual scheme for the analysis of knowledge production in problem-oriented research, which is subsequently applied to an empirical analysis of 16 transdisciplinary research projects. In our analysis, we focus upon forms of knowledge integration and participation. The results indicate that, from an epistemological point of view, TDR does not represent a specific mode of knowledge production, but a rather heterogeneous conglomeration of different research activities. In order to evaluate the epistemic potential of TDR, we conclude that it would be wise to disentangle it methodologically into various types of research objectives and related research instruments.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darcy C. Plymire

This theoretical essay applies active audience theory, convergence theory, and contemporary understandings of Web logs to an analysis of knowledge production in the antidoping movement. Using the Floyd Landis doping case as an example it examines how cycling fans and other interested parties used Internet sites such as wikis and blogs to mount a challenge to the hegemony of institutional knowledge produced by organizations such as the World Anti Doping Agency and Union Cycliste Internationale. The essay concludes that Landis’s so-called wiki defense—based as it was on popular challenges to received knowledge—was a successful contestation of normative procedures and institutional authority in the prosecution of doping allegations in international sport.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document