Benchmarking in the European Water Sector

Author(s):  
Alan Horncastle ◽  
Joseph Duffy ◽  
Chien Xen Ng ◽  
Peter Krupa
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Bach

AbstractOn 3rd and 4th April 2008 a conference containing the “Perspectives of European Water Management Law” took place in Brussels with participation of about 80 representatives of the European Commission and universities, authorities, enterprises and associations of the individual Member States of the European Community. The focus of the conference was on the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC and its implementation into national law, whereby the “polluter pays principle” arouse special interest. Another important and controversial topic was whether privatisation of the water sector would be advantageous or disadvantageous in regard to efficient allocation and sustainable environmental protection. Beyond the conference dealt with the public procurement in the water sector in relation to the directive 2004/17/EC, with the reorganisation of European protection against floods in the course of the EU flood directive 2007/60/EC and the effects of climate change on hydrologic balance.


Water Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 918-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ank Michels

Public participation has become increasingly important in the water sector. However, the question remains as to what exactly is meant by participation. This paper explores the different ways that participation is understood in local and regional water plans and visions in the Dutch water sector. Partly driven by the key role played by participatory water management under the European Water Framework Directive, citizens’ engagement has become an important aspect in the plans of authorities across the board that are involved in water management. The study concludes that the most dominant view on participation is very narrow, with a strong focus on clarification and on raising awareness. According to a second, less dominant view on participation, it is stressed that the role of participation is to produce information, knowledge, and expertise to support policy making. As a consequence, power relations between government and the public remain very much top down, with very little room for bottom-up ideas.


Waterlines ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Harnmeijer ◽  
Sally Sutton
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franca Angela Buelow

To arrive at a good status of all European water bodies is the main objective of the European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive (WFD). Since its adoption in 2000, the policy has fundamentally changed the institutional, procedural and organizational structures of Member States' water management, leading to an Europeanization of national legislation and decision-making structures. The case of WFD implementation in Schleswig-Holstein is an example of the policy's highly innovative governance architecture that unfortunately is not (yet) able to take that one last hurdle: to improve water quality and establish a good water status across EU Member States by 2015 or 2027.


10.1596/31417 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ikeda ◽  
Ken Liffiton
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document