Formation and Improvement of the Socialist Legal System with Chinese Characteristics

Author(s):  
Lin Li
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUN-LING YU

The promulgation of the "Civil Code" provides a path for the codification of other important legal departments closely related to the socialist market economy and the improvement of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics. However, due to the fact that the development of economic law in our country is relatively short and the economic development is changing rapidly, the current economic code is facing numerous obstacles. This article analyzes the relationship between civil law and economic law, drawing on the innovation of the content of the Civil Code, and puts forward new requirements for the development of the content, concept and system of economic law, and promotes the development of economic law.


2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1065-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengxin Huo

On 28 October 2010, the Standing Committee of the Eleventh National People's Congress adopted China's first statute on the Conflict of Laws: the ‘Act on the Application of Laws over Foreign-related Civil Relationships’ (‘Conflicts Act’).1 The adoption was an historic event in Chinese legislative history, as it indicates China has modernised its conflict-of-law rules after many years of unremitting efforts made by legislators and scholars. More importantly, it means that ‘a socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics’ has been successfully established, and allows China to claim to have a systematic legal system.2


2019 ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
WILLIAM ELLIOTT BUTLER

The author re-examines in this article the foundations for the traditional classifications of legal systems in comparative legal studies and suggests the usefulness of a kaleidoscopic perception of legal classifications and change, commencing from the revolutions of 1917 down to the present with special reference to the enduring impact on Asian legal systems. China, Mongolia, Vietnam, and Laos, together with Cuba and Ethiopia, are arguably the surviving systems of the socialist legal tradition – few in number but massive in population. Various perspectives are suggested for classifying legal systems. None are regarded as mutually exclusive; that is, a single national legal system may display features of several familial characteristics. A substantial list of possible characteristics of socialist legal systems is given, as is a lengthy enumeration of possible categories of families of legal systems: socialist/totalitarian, technocratic, formalist, transitional, RomanoGermanic, mixed, Slavic, Eurasian, among others. With respect to Asian socialist legal systems, the article asks whether it is descriptively and analytically more correct to, for example, describe China as a “socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics” or a “Chinese legal system with socialist characteristics”. In either event, or a modification of the juxtaposition, the question remains: what factors make China one or the other? Whatever the answer at any given moment in time, a kaleidoscopic perception of legal change and movement looks less for eternal verities than for constant readjustment, constant re-evaluation of the balance of factors that comprise a legal system, and the development of additional relevant criteria that help identify the forces at work in legal development.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 993-1008
Author(s):  
Albert A. Trofimov ◽  

The article analyzes the current budget legal regulation in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The author applies the context-legal approach, which assumes the obligation to take into account the features of the modern Chinese legal system. The features of “socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era” are able to provide a deeper understanding of the public finance legal regulation (especially budget law). The analysis of various sources of the budget law in the PRC leads to the conclusion about the frequently occurring inconsistency of the Chinese legislator, uncertainty and declarative nature of the budget legal norms. The problem of the multiplicity of sources of legal regulation, which entails excessive duplication of legal norms, exists alongside the problem of the lack of a clear hierarchy of normative legal acts in the Chinese legal system. The ongoing reforms are seen as fragmentary, often becoming the main cause of contradictions between the introduced and non-repealed normative legal acts. In the article, special attention is paid to China’s experimental (pilot) procedure for the adoption of normative legal acts, which has a number of disadvantages that reduce the guarantees of the rights of obligated subjects. The article also provides an analysis of the existing sources of China’s budget law: from the constitutional level to the local one. It is found that the basic Budget Law of the PRC is flawed and not devoid of uncertainties. At the same time, the discussion on the role of the acts of the Communist Party of China provides new evidence that such acts have characteristics of a source of law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuanming Zhang

Mr. Wang Huiyan is the leader of contemporary Chinese Marxist politics, and has made outstanding contributions to the Chinese characteristics, Chinese style and Chinese style formed by Chinese politics. Mr. Wang’s political thoughts have always been guided by Marxism, and China’s national conditions have always been the starting point for political studies. He creatively proposed the Marxist political theory system and principle curriculum system with state power as the core, and developed It has established important theories such as the construction of socialist democracy and legal system with Chinese characteristics. Mr. Wang's theoretical system of Marxist politics has been vigorously promoted by the academic circles and has made outstanding contributions to the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics.


Author(s):  
Changyu Yang

The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Code) was formally implemented on January 1st, 202. The promulgation and implementation of the Civil Code has become a milestone in the process of the rule of law in China, refl ecting the degree and characteristics of the development of the rule of law in China. Among the many features of the Civil Code, the systematical innovation has become the most remarkable highlight, and the systematical research on the Civil Code has become the focus and hot topic in the academic research on Chinese law. In the research process of scholars, genealogy of law, legal system, the rule of law system and the national governance system are four common categories, each of which refl ects the unique characteristics of China’s civil code from different perspectives and refl ects the consciousness of methodology. The category of genealogy of law shows the cultural characteristics of the civil code. Firstly, from the perspective of the genealogy of law containing cultural factors, the Civil Code integrates the socialist core values with Chinese characteristics, which are showed, for example, in the Marriage and Family chapters and the Right of Personality chapters. Secondly, the category of legal system highlights the normative status of the Civil Code. Observed from the organic integrity of legal system, the Civil Code occupies the core and important position in the socialist legal normative system with Chinese characteristics. Thirdly, the category of the rule of law system explains the characteristics of the new era of the Civil Code. The rule of law system is derived from the innovation of China’s rule of law practice, and is one of the general goals of China’s comprehensive rule of law. In this sense, the formulation and implementation of the Civil Code is an important practice of improving the “complete system of legal norms”. Last but not the least, the category of national governance system outlines the governance characteristics of the Civil Code, and the Civil Code fully implements the governance logic of the overall layout of the country, the Five-sphere Integrated Plan, including the promotion in the areas of economy, politics, culture, society and ecology. The application of the four categories has realized four sorts of transformation of the mode of thinking, namely, from the world’s genealogy of law to the legal system of China, from the form system of the Civil Code to the value system of it, from the generality of civil law system to the particularity of Chinese civil code system and from the normative system of the Civil Code to the national governance system. The transformation of the researching logic refl ects the methodological consciousness in the systematic study of the Civil Code. First of all, the systematic study of the Civil Code has transmitted from ontology through epistemology to the methodological consciousness. Ontological research solves the basic problem of “what is” and clarifi es the basic systematic structure of the Civil Code. The study of epistemology solves the problem of “how to know”, which is embodied the search for the method and path of the cognition of the Civil Code. While, the Methodological research is a re-examination of methods and cognitive approaches, with more refl ective elements, and is a study on the existing systematic research on the Civil Code. Secondly, the four systematic transformations mentioned above refl ect the consciousness of Chinese researchers to take on their mission. Since the founding of new China over the past 70 years, the independent discourse system of the academic research of Chinese scholars and the rule of law has been generated. Seeking the indigenization of the construction of the rule of law in China, seeking the integrity of the knowledge system of law and the rule of law system in China, seeking the harmonious relationship between the characteristic theories and the general theories in the process of the production of Chinese legal knowledge, etc., belong to the question of the age. Therefore, the methodology consciousness in the study of the Civil Code shows the Chinese researchers’ consciousness to take on the burden of the coming era. Third, it should be noted that the methodological consciousness also reveals some problems in the current research on the Civil Code: (1) the researchers should avoid being merely the porters of certain concepts and categories when applying the basic categorical methods, and shall be fully understand each category in the specifi c areas and the latest achievements of related research, avoiding taking the words simply literally; (2) the related various systems and categories should be interpreted basing on the spirit of the age and the characteristics of the rule of law in China, and we should pay attention to the differences and organic links between them; (3) the four categories mostly often be applied by the researchers from the internal system of the civil code, lacking of the comprehensively combination of the internal and external perspectives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document