School Mathematics Curricula

2019 ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-166
Author(s):  
Gary A. Deatsman

I had always assumed that the development of school mathematics curricula since the nineteenth century had been characterized by fairly steady progress accelerated by the “new math” movement of the last decade. Back in the days of horse and buggy, mathematics education was supposedly strictly rote learning of rules and algorithms with little or no understanding. Endless drill was employed to produce the army of accurate human calculators needed before machines were developed to take over this work.


1959 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 334-346
Author(s):  
Izaak Wirszup

Russians follow developments in American education with interest. Most certainly we should acquaint ourselves with the basic Russian curricular pattern.


2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 540-589
Author(s):  
Tami S. Martin ◽  
Cheryl A. Hunt ◽  
John Lannin ◽  
William Leonard ◽  
Gerald L. Marshall ◽  
...  

This analysis of the five NSF–funded secondary mathematics curricula describes their alignment with the Process Standards and Content Standards in Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Distinctive features and examples are included.


1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-255
Author(s):  
Sharon Stenglein

ln this National Science Foundation (NFS) Teacher Enhancement Project, fifty Minnesota middle school and high school mathematics teachers are collaborating with three Saint Olaf CoUege mathematics professors to integrate inquiry-based geometry and visualization across their secondary mathematics curricula.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-422
Author(s):  
James Fey

For mathematics educators of a certain age or those with particular expertise in the history of mathematics education, the appearance of a book that purports to describe, analyze, and explain the “new math” movement of the 1950s and 1960s quite reasonably prompts the question: What else could possibly be said about that iconic era? Others with less experience in or historical knowledge of the field might pass on the book because they are only vaguely aware of the new math as a longago and thoroughly discredited effort to reform school mathematics curricula and teaching. However, I think mathematics educators in both groups–knowledgeable veterans and newcomers to the field–will find Christopher J. Phillips's retelling of the new math story a fascinating read that is filled with timeless insights into the academic and political dynamics of school mathematics and, more broadly, American education.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Zahid Abdush Shomad ◽  
Iwan Junaedi ◽  
Mulyono Mulyono

<p class="JRPMAbstractBodyEnglish">Australia grants individual states autonomy to develop school mathematics curricula. This article aims to find out a model for developing a school mathematics curriculum in Queensland. The method used in this research is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). This SLR method can be used to identify, review, evaluate, and interpret studies related to the topics discussed in this study, with specific relevant research questions. The SLR method in this research is carried out by systematically reviewing and identifying journals, which follow the steps or protocols that have been set in each process. The documents studied and researched include journals and professional scientific papers and Queensland mathematics curriculum documents for grades 11 and 12, namely the Queensland Curriculum &amp; Assessment Authority (QCAA). Based on the results of the literature review, it was found that in Queensland, the mathematics curriculum in grades 11 and 12 is divided into three types, namely Mathematics A curriculum, Mathematics B curriculum, and Mathematics C curriculum. Each type of curriculum is developed according to the conditions and skills required by students.</p>


1982 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Kil S. Lee

In the past twenty years, problem solving has received much attention from mathematics educators. Inclusion of imaginative problems in school mathematics curricula was recommended in the 1963 Cambridge Conference report. Problem solving was the first of the ten basic mathematical skills identified by the National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics in 1976 and the position of the NCSM was endorsed by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics in 1978. “That problem solving be the focus of school mathematics in the 1980s” is the first of eight recommendations expressed in An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s published by the NCTM.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-213
Author(s):  
Cynthia W. Langrall

In today's world, data and statistical information permeate our lives, making it imperative that we educate students to be statistically literate. Statistical literacy is the ability to read and interpret statistical information to make informed decisions about events under conditions of uncertainty. Recently, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) published a document, Catalyzing Change in High School Mathematics: Initiating Critical Conversations (2018), in which it proposed statistics as one of four essential content domains in secondary school mathematics and acknowledged quantitative literacy—the ability to reason both statistically and numerically—as a crucial life skill for all students. For a number of years, statistics has been an important content strand across grade levels in the school mathematics curricula of many countries. Thus, it is understandable that students and even teachers might perceive statistics simply as another topic in mathematics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document