Cartilage and Osteochondral Injury

Author(s):  
Jiashen Shao ◽  
Yingze Zhang
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 678-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Costouros ◽  
Alexis C. Dang ◽  
Hubert T. Kim

Orthopedics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
William P Hami1ton ◽  
James B Bennett
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1012-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Sanders ◽  
Ayoosh Pareek ◽  
Nicholas R. Johnson ◽  
Michael J. Stuart ◽  
Diane L. Dahm ◽  
...  

Background: The rate of patellofemoral arthritis after lateral patellar dislocation is unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of patellofemoral arthritis and knee arthroplasty between patients who experienced a lateral patellar dislocation and matched individuals without a patellar dislocation. Additionally, factors predictive of arthritis after patellar dislocation were examined. The hypothesis was that the rate of arthritis is likely higher among patients who experience a patellar dislocation compared with those who do not. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In this study, 609 patients who had a first-time lateral patellar dislocation between 1990 and 2010 were compared with an age- and sex-matched cohort of patients who did not have a patellar dislocation. Medical records were reviewed to collect information related to the initial injury, recurrent dislocation, treatment, and progression to clinically significant patellofemoral arthritis (defined as symptoms with degenerative changes on patellar sunrise radiographs). Factors associated with arthritis (age, sex, recurrence, osteochondral injury, trochlear dysplasia) were examined. Results: At a mean follow-up of 12.3 ± 6.5 years from initial dislocation, 58 patients (9.5%) in the dislocation cohort were diagnosed with patellofemoral arthritis, corresponding to a cumulative incidence of arthritis of 1.2% at 5 years, 2.7% at 10 years, 8.1% at 15 years, 14.8% at 20 years, and 48.9% at 25 years. In the control cohort, 8 patients (1.3%) were diagnosed with arthritis, corresponding to a cumulative incidence of arthritis of 0% at 5 years, 0% at 10 years, 1.3% at 15 years, 2.9% at 20 years, and 8.3% at 25 years. Therefore, patients who experienced a lateral patellar dislocation had a significantly higher risk of developing arthritis (hazard ratio [HR], 7.8; 95% CI, 3.9-17.6; P < .001) than individuals without a patellar dislocation. However, the risk of knee arthroplasty was similar between groups (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.6-19.7; P = .2). Recurrent patellar dislocations (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.6-12.6), osteochondral injury (HR, 11.3; 95% CI, 5.0-26.6), and trochlear dysplasia (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3-10.0) were associated with arthritis after patellar dislocation. Conclusion: Patellar dislocation is a significant risk factor for patellofemoral arthritis, as nearly half of patients have symptoms and radiographic changes consistent with arthritis at 25 years after lateral patellar dislocation. Osteochondral injury, recurrent patellar instability, and trochlear dysplasia are associated with the development of arthritis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (07) ◽  
pp. 686-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Stoker ◽  
Chantelle Bozynski ◽  
Keiichi Kuroki ◽  
Kevin Clarke ◽  
Jed Johnson ◽  
...  

AbstractStromal vascular fraction (SVF) contains a small number of mesenchymal stem cells and has been used as a treatment for osteoarthritis and cartilage injury. Due to limited evidence of successful cartilage regeneration with injected stem cell therapies, there is interest in combining cellular therapies with injectable scaffolding materials to increase intra-articular residence times of stem cells and improve tissue regeneration. However, the safety of intra-articular injection of SVF combined with injectable scaffolds is unestablished. Also, it is unclear if SVF therapy is superior to more easily prepared biologics, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of SVF when combined with an injectable poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanofiber scaffold and to provide a comparison of SVF therapy to PRP. A total of 12 Beagles had osteochondral defects created in both medial femoral condyles and 4 dogs each were allocated to treatment groups of SVF (n = 4), SVF plus PLGA scaffolding (n = 4), or leukoreduced PRP (n = 4). One knee in each dog received treatment, and the contralateral knee was sham treated with saline. Dogs were assessed over a 6-month period, and outcome measures included functional, radiographic, biochemical, and histological assessments. PRP treatment resulted in improvements in lameness scores and objective kinetic assessments of function. There were no statistically significant improvements in function, cartilage biochemical composition, or histology for SVF-treated knees. The combination of SVF and the injectable PLGA scaffold had worse outcomes than other groups including sham treatment based upon functional, biochemical, and histological assessments, raising concerns over the safety of this scaffold for intra-articular injection.


2003 ◽  
Vol 07 (03n04) ◽  
pp. 157-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Willers ◽  
David J. Wood ◽  
Ming H. Zheng

Osteochondral injury occurs predominantly in physically active young adult males. Injury to the articular cartilage and/or subchondral bone may not only cause acute joint disease resulting in osseous intracapsular (synovitis) or extracapsular pain, but may also act to spawn arthritic conditions in later life. Since the 18th century, such injury has proven difficult to treat clinically, and much therapy has been essentially palliative. Past treatments such as abrasion arthroplasty, drilling, microfracture and arthroscopic lavage have been useful in removing articular debris and promoting the formation of the fibrin clot used in most native repair mechanisms. However, the limitation of these techniques is their inability to restore the damaged cartilage and subchondral bone to their normal tissue architecture. Recent developments in tissue engineering have concentrated on the utilization of autologous chondrocyte implantation, biomaterials and growth factors to promote the regeneration of biomechanically superior hyaline articular cartilage. This paper reviews the etiology, repair biology and therapeutic techniques of cartilage and/or osteochondral injury over the previous decades, and attempts to provide insight into interesting new research directions which offer much potential for improved treatment of these troublesome lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document