Risk Factors for Posterior Segment Complications of Cataract Surgery

Author(s):  
Sabyasachi Sengupta ◽  
Rahul Mahajan ◽  
Rhuta Mahajan ◽  
Arup Chakrabarti
Eye ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Pavesio ◽  
Carsten Heinz

Abstract Background Prevention of non-infectious uveitis of the posterior segment (NIU-PS) recurrence using 0.2 μg/day fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi) was assessed over 3 years (NCT01694186). Outcomes for FAi-treated and fellow eyes with NIU-PS were compared, to evaluate FAi versus conventional treatment strategies. Methods Eligible subjects had >1-year recurrent NIU-PS history and either ≥2 separate recurrences requiring treatment, or corticosteroid therapy (systemic or ocular) in the 12 months preceding study entry. Bilateral disease was present and analysed in 59/87 FAi-treated participants. Recurrence rates, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes, cataract surgery, intraocular pressure (IOP) events and adjunctive medication use were compared for FAi-treated and fellow eyes. Results Over 36 months, more FAi-treated than fellow eyes remained recurrence-free (28.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.001; mean 1.9 vs. 4.7 recurrences, respectively, P < 0.0001). FAi-treated eyes gained +9.6 letters BCVA, versus a loss of −4.4 in fellow eyes (P < 0.0001). Systemic medications were given to 42.4% of subjects. Intra/periocular adjunctive injections were lower in FAi-treated than fellow eyes (20.3% vs. 66.1%, P < 0.0001); topical corticosteroid use was also lower in FAi-treated than fellow eyes (27.1% vs 52.5%, P = 0.0041). IOP-related events occurred at similar rates in both FAi-treated and fellow eyes, excepting IOP-lowering surgery (5.1% vs. 15.3%, respectively; P = 0.1251). Cataract surgery occurred in 72.0% of FAi-treated and 37.0% of fellow eyes. Conclusions In subjects with bilateral NIU-PS, continuous, low-dose corticosteroid with 0.2 μg/day FAi reduced recurrence and adjunctive medication requirements, and improved vision over 36 months, providing greater protection against ocular inflammation than a reactive approach using standard of care.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumita Agarkar ◽  
Varada Vinay Gokhale ◽  
Rajiv Raman ◽  
Muna Bhende ◽  
Gayathri Swaminathan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 5210
Author(s):  
Haiou Wang ◽  
Jingwei Zheng ◽  
Qinxiang Zheng ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Cong Ye ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1688-1693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ditte Artzén ◽  
Mats Lundström ◽  
Anders Behndig ◽  
Ulf Stenevi ◽  
Eva Lydahl ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4115
Author(s):  
Hiromitsu Onoe ◽  
Kazuyuki Hirooka ◽  
Hideaki Okumichi ◽  
Yumiko Murakami ◽  
Yoshiaki Kiuchi

We examined postoperative corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) present after combined phacoemulsification with either microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (μLOT-Phaco) or goniotomy, using the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB-Phaco). Retrospective study: A total of 45 eyes underwent μLOT-Phaco and KDB-Phaco (LOT-Phaco) procedures, with 21 eyes that underwent cataract surgery alone used as controls. Visual acuity and corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations were analyzed before and at 1, 2, and 3 months after the surgeries. Risk factors that could potentially influence HOAs were evaluated. No significant postoperative changes were noted for corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations after cataract surgery alone. The mean corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations were 0.222 ± 0.115 μm, 0.203 ± 0.113 μm, and 0.084 ± 0.043 μm at baseline and 0.326 ± 0.195 μm (p < 0.001), 0.302 ± 0.289 μm (p = 0.03), and 0.150 ± 0.115 μm (p < 0.001) at 3 months after LOT-Phaco, respectively. Results of the analysis for risk factors suggested that a longer incision in Schlemm’s canal could influence corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations after LOT-Phaco. Although no significant postoperative changes were observed in corneal HOAs and coma-like or spherical-like aberrations after cataract surgery alone, a significant increase in corneal HOAs and coma-like or spherical-like aberrations remained after the LOT-Phaco procedure.


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (143) ◽  
pp. 433-437
Author(s):  
Sudesh Subedi

Patient with diabetes mellitus have a higher prevalence of lens opacity 1and cataractdevelopment at an earlier age than non diabetic.2Cataract in diabetes mellitus decreasesthe visual acuity, makes posterior segment evaluation and laser treatment difficult.Several studies have shown that there is progression of diabetic retinopathy after cataractsurgery. In all studies, criteria for progression of diabetic retinopathy are:a) progression of any form/type or stage of diabetic eye (DE), nonproliferative diabeticretinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) to any advanced,recurrent form/ type or stage of NPDR or PDR andb) development of new clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and/or worsening/recurrent of preexisting CSME defined by Early Treatment Diabetic RetinopathyStudy (ETDRS).• More severe the preexisting diabetic retinopathy (DR), much worse the DR aftercataract extraction. The progression of DR after cataract extraction is severe inIntracapsular Cataract Extraction (ICCE) than Extracapsular Cataract Extraction(ECCE) with Intraocular Lens (IOL) and Sutureless Small Incision CataractSurgery (SICS) and Phacoemulcification.• Progression of DR increases with complicated cataract surgery, like posteriorcapsular rupture (PCR), vitreous loss and prolonged surgery.• The first 6 months period is crucial as a minimum period of follow up to detectprogression of DR.• There are other several local and systemic risk factors for the progression of DR,like hypertension, renal failure, ischemic heart disease, high cholesterol andtriglyceride level, pregnancy etc.Key Words: Diabetic retinopathy, cataract surgery, risk factors


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chirag Patel ◽  
Stephen Jae Kim ◽  
Amy Chomsky ◽  
Mazeyar Saboori

Ophthalmology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy V. Hatch ◽  
Geta Cernat ◽  
David Wong ◽  
Robert Devenyi ◽  
Chaim M. Bell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document