Influence of Masonry Infill Panels on the Seismic Performance of Irregular Buildings

Author(s):  
Zaid Mohammad ◽  
Mohd. Akif Razi ◽  
Abdul Baqi
2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 185-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayoub Dehghani ◽  
Gregor Fischer ◽  
Fariborz Nateghi Alahi

2016 ◽  
Vol 142 (10) ◽  
pp. 04016083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roohollah Ahmady Jazany ◽  
Iman Hajirasouliha ◽  
Abdolreza S. Moghadam ◽  
Hossein Kayhani ◽  
Hamidreza Farshchi

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Mohyeddin ◽  
Helen M. Goldsworthy ◽  
Emad F. Gad

Author(s):  
Ishita Verma ◽  
◽  
Shobha Ram ◽  
M. K. Bhardwaj ◽  
Nirendra Dev ◽  
...  

Building structures are subjected to vibrations due to earthquake activity. There are many characteristics that induce irregularities in buildings. Apart from other reasons, these irregularities may be; many times; due to non-uniform distribution of mass, stiffness, or strength in the structure of the building. Due to such irregularities; buildings are subjected to some undesirable effects which make them weaker compared to regular buildings. Indian Standard code of practice IS 1893 – (Part 1): 2016 [1] details guidelines to be followed so that buildings are less and less irregular. Many times such guidelines may be the result of past studies of actual performances of buildings in seismic events. It is the intended purpose of this paper to bring a review of standard guidelines which are important for irregular buildings for preventing various typical damages to occur in seismic conditions. Typical examples of past damages have been provided to draw lessons.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 919-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Abdelaziz ◽  
Mohamed S. Gomaa ◽  
Hany El-Ghazaly

Introduction:Unreinforced Masonry infill walls (URM) are commonly used in the Reinforced Concrete (RC) framed structures as interiors and exteriors partition walls. Although they usually are not considered in the structural analysis and design, their influence on the seismic performance of the framed structures is significant. A common practice in the modern and old RC buildings is to remove the URM walls in the lower stories for commercial reasons; garages, storages, shopsetc.Methods:In the present work, the effect of the URM walls on seismic performance of the RC framed structure will be studied. For that, three groups of 2-D three-bay framed structures, which are fully and partially infilled with the URM walls, will be studied. These groups are classified as three stories, six stories, and nine stories RC framed structures representing low, medium and, high rise buildings; respectively. In each group, different infill panels' configuration will be studied in order to simulate the cases of ignoring or considering the stiffness and strength of the URM. Double-strut nonlinear cyclic model for masonry panels has been utilized in order to account for the structural action of the URM walls. Pushover analysis is adopted for the evaluation of the seismic response of the frames considering the material inelasticity and the geometric nonlinearity in the analysis.Results and Conclusion:Some selected numerical simulation results in terms of base shear forces, lateral deflections, and inter-story drift ratios are obtained for all the considered configurations and presented in comparative way. The regular distribution of the infill walls can improve the framed structure performance. However, omitting the infill from the ground story leads to soft story phenomena as the columns in this story are more vulnerable due to the shear forces acting on them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document