Analysis of pericentromeric chromosome 21 specific YAC clones by FISH: Identification of new markers for molecular-cytogenetic application

1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
YuriB. Yurov ◽  
Anne-Marie Laurent ◽  
Bertrand Marcais ◽  
SvetlanaG. Vorsanova ◽  
Gerard Roizes
Gene ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 522 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Ping Chen ◽  
Po-Jen Cheng ◽  
Shuenn-Dyh Chang ◽  
Yi-Xuan Lee ◽  
Jin-Chung Shih ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Araújo Fonzar Hernandes ◽  
Terezinha de Jesus Marques-Salles ◽  
Hasmik Mkrtchyan ◽  
Eliane Maria Soares-Ventura ◽  
Edinalva Pereira Leite ◽  
...  

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), CD10+ B-cell precursor, represents the most frequent type of childhood ALL from 3 to 6 years of age. The t(12;21)(p13;q22) occurs in 25% of cases of B-cell precursor ALL, it is rare in children less than 24 months and have been related to good prognosis. Some relapse cases and unfavorable prognosis in ALL CD10+ are associated with t(12;21) bearing additional aberrations as extra copies of chromosome 21 andETV6gene loss. This report describes the case of a 15 month-year old girl, who displayed a karyotype with addition on chromosome 12p plus trisomy 10 and tetrasomy of chromosome 21. Molecular cytogenetic studies revealed two extra copies of the der(21) t(12;21), trisomy 10 and deletion of the secondETV6gene due to the dic(12;18). These findings show the great importance of molecular cytogenetic studies to clarify complex karyotypes, to define prognostic, to carry out risk group stratification and to support correctly disease treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4272-4272
Author(s):  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
Francesco Albano ◽  
Luisa Anelli ◽  
Antonella Zagaria ◽  
Arcangelo Liso ◽  
...  

Abstract Translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22) is a common karyotypic abnormality detected in about 15% of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) cases. The rearrangement results in fusion of the RUNX1 (also known as AML1) and CBFA2T1 (also known as ETO) genes generating a 5′RUNX1/3′CBFA2T1 transcriptionally active fusion gene on derivative chromosome 8. In 1 to 8.5% of AML cases insertions events generating a 5′RUNX1/3′CBFA2T1 fusion gene have been reported, whereas the occurrence of inversions accompanying the t(8;21) has never been observed. We report a screening of 82 AML cases bearing the RUNX1/CBFA2T1 rearrangement detected by RT-PCR; all cases were tested by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) with BAC and PAC clones specific for CBFA2T1 and RUNX1 genes. This analysis allowed us to reveal five cases with ins(21;8), one with ins(8;21), and two with a pericentric chromosome 8 inversion followed by a t(8;21) translocation. A detailed molecular cytogenetic characterization of breakpoints has been performed in all cases. FISH co-hybridization experiments with CBFA2T1 and RUNX1 probes revealed the presence of a functional fusion gene on the der(21) instead of the der(8) chromosome in five cases with ins(21;8); a single fusion signal on the der(8) chromosome was detected in the case with ins(8;21). The use of the same clones in FISH studies showed the presence of a single unexpected fusion signal on the 8p derivative chromosome in addition to faint CBFA2T1 and RUNX1 signals on the long arm of der(8) and der(21) chromosomes, respectively. These results suggested that a pericentric chromosome 8 inversion involving CBFA2T1 gene occurred and that the chromosome 21 was rearranged with the 8p derivative chromosome. Appropriate chromosome 21 and 8 BAC clones were employed to precisely define the size of inserted regions in cases with insertions and the breakpoint on the 8p derivative chromosome in cases showing pericentric chromosome 8 inversion. The insertion size turned out to be very heterogeneous, ranging from a minimum of 2.4 Mb to a maximum of 44 Mb. In both cases with chromosome 8 inversion, the CBFA2T1 gene represents the breakpoint at the chromosome 8 long arm whereas the 8p breakpoint showed different mapping positions in 8p21.3 and 8p21.1, respectively. Our results illustrate that (1) heterogeneous mechanisms can lead to the generation of the 5′RUNX1/3′CBFA2T1 chimeric gene; (2) molecular cytogenetic techniques may identify cryptic chromosomal changes, not detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis; (3) the crucial role of the 5′RUNX1/3′CBFA2T1 fusion gene in leukemogenesis does not depend on its location.


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-160
Author(s):  
Chih-Ping Chen ◽  
Liang-Kai Wang ◽  
Schu-Rern Chern ◽  
Peih-Shan Wu ◽  
Shin-Wen Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document