A single protocol to detect transcripts of various types and expression levels in neural tissue and cultured cells: in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labelled cRNA probes

1993 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 431-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Schaeren-Wiemers ◽  
Andrea Gerfin-Moser
1990 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-178
Author(s):  
Toshio IKEDA ◽  
Yasuhiro YOSHIKAWA ◽  
Kazuya YAMANOUCHI

1993 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 1187-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.W. Dirks ◽  
F.M. van de Rijke ◽  
S. Fujishita ◽  
M. van der Ploeg ◽  
A.K. Raap

We have determined optimal conditions for the detection of mRNA sequences in cultured cells by nonradioactive in situ hybridization. For this purpose a number of different cell lines have been used: rat 9G cells for the detection of human cytomegalovirus immediate early mRNA, and HeLa as well as 5637 carcinoma cells for the detection of housekeeping gene mRNAs. Extensive optimization of fixation and pretreatment conditions revealed that most intense hybridization signals are obtained when cells are grown on glass microscope slides, fixed with a mixture of formaldehyde and acetic acid, pretreated with pepsin and denatured prior to hybridization. In addition, we also studied the potential of fluorochromized probes for the direct detection of multiple RNA sequences. The optimized in situ hybridization procedure revealed that immediate early mRNA transcripts are, in addition to a cytoplasmic localization, localized within nuclei of rat 9G cells. Double hybridization experiments showed that intron and exon sequences colocalize within the main nuclear signal. In addition, the presence of small, intron-specific, fluorescent spots scattered around the main nuclear signals indicates that intron sequences which are spliced out can be visualized. Additional information about the functioning of cells could be obtained by the detection of mRNA simultaneously with bromodeoxyuridine, incorporated during S-phase, or its cognate protein. The sensitivity of these methods is such that mRNAs of abundantly expressed housekeeping genes can be detected in a variety of cell lines with high signal to noise ratios.


2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danijela Drakulic ◽  
Milena Stevanovic ◽  
Gordana Nikcevic

RNA-RNA in situ hybridization is a reliable method for studying tissue and cell specific gene expression, which enables visualization of labeled antisense RNA probe hybridized to specific mRNA. In this study we employed non-radioactive RNA-RNA in situ hybridization using biotin- or digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes in order to detect SOX gene expression in carcinoma cell lines. By this approach we confirmed results obtained by Northern blot analysis, where the presence of SOX2 mRNA in NT2/D1 and SOX14 mRNA in HepG2 cells has been established. Our aim was to set up RNA-RNA in situ hybridization method in in vitro cultured cells in order to perform further analyses of SOX gene expression on various normal and cancer tissues.


Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Bolce ◽  
A. Hemmati-Brivanlou ◽  
P.D. Kushner ◽  
R.M. Harland

The peptide growth factor Activin A has been shown to induce complete axial structures in explanted blastula animal caps. However, it is not understood how much this response to activin depends upon early signals that prepattern the ectoderm. We have therefore asked what tissues can be induced in blastula animal caps by activin in the absence of early dorsal signals. Using whole-mount in situ hybridization, we compare the expression of three neural markers, N-CAM, En-2 and Krox-20 in activin-treated ectoderm from control and ventralized embryos. In response to activin, both normal and ventralized animal caps frequently form neural tissue (and express N-CAM) and express the hindbrain marker Krox-20. However, the more anterior marker, En-2, is expressed in only a small fraction of normal animal caps and rarely in ventralized animal caps; the frequency of expression does not increase with higher doses of activin. In all cases En-2 and Krox-20 are expressed in coherent patches or stripes in the induced caps. Although mesoderm is induced in both control and ventralized animal caps, notochord is found in response to activin at moderate frequency in control caps, but rarely in ventralized animal caps. These results support the idea that in the absence of other signals, activin treatment elicits hindbrain but not notochord or anterior neural tissue; and thus, the anterior and dorsal extent of tissues formed in response to activin depends on a prior prepatterning or previous inductions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document