The Additive Factor Method: A differential diagnostic tool in hyperactivity and learning disability

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap van der Meere ◽  
Maarten van Baal ◽  
Joseph Sergeant
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disability ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Factor Method ◽  
Additive Factor Method

The Additive Factor Method in Brain Imaging

2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Sartori ◽  
Carlo Umiltà
Keyword(s):  
Brain Imaging ◽  
Factor Method ◽  
Additive Factor Method

Test of the Additive-Factor Method of Choice Reaction Time Analysis

1975 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Blackman
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Naming Task ◽  
Stimulus Quality ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Factor Method ◽  
Translation Stage ◽  
Additive Factor Method ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Number Naming

In a test of Sternberg's (1969) additive-factor method of reaction time (RT) analysis, stimulus quality (intact, degraded), relative stimulus frequency (70:15:15), and S-R compatibility (naming, naming-plus-one), each had significant effects on RT in a number-naming task. Additivity of the means, variances, and third cumulants of RT for the quality and compatibility factors showed the RT components attributable to the two stages influenced by these two variables to be stochastically independent. Relative stimulus frequency interacted with both quality and compatibility in determining RT. It was concluded that the effect of stimulus quality arose at the stimulus encoding stage, and the effect of compatibility at the S-R translation stage, while the duration of both stages was influenced by relative stimulus frequency.

The additive factor method in rat information processing

2000 ◽  
Vol 50 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Courtière ◽  
J Hardouin ◽  
T Hasbroucq ◽  
C.-A Possamaı̈ ◽  
F Vidal
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Factor Method ◽  
Additive Factor Method

The Elicited Language Analysis Procedure

1982 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Larry J. Mattes
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Analysis Procedure ◽  
Elicited Imitation ◽  
Response Quality ◽  
Semantic Relationships ◽  
Language Analysis

Elicited imitation tasks are frequently used as a diagnostic tool in evaluating children with communication handicaps. This article presents a scoring procedure that can be used to obtain an in-depth descriptive analysis of responses produced on elicited imitation tasks. The Elicited Language Analysis Procedure makes it possible to systematically evaluate responses in terms of both their syntactic and semantic relationships to the stimulus sentences presented by the examiner. Response quality measures are also included in the analysis procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document