The additive factor method in rat information processing

2000 ◽  
Vol 50 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Courtière ◽  
J Hardouin ◽  
T Hasbroucq ◽  
C.-A Possamaı̈ ◽  
F Vidal
2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Sartori ◽  
Carlo Umiltà

1975 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Blackman

In a test of Sternberg's (1969) additive-factor method of reaction time (RT) analysis, stimulus quality (intact, degraded), relative stimulus frequency (70:15:15), and S-R compatibility (naming, naming-plus-one), each had significant effects on RT in a number-naming task. Additivity of the means, variances, and third cumulants of RT for the quality and compatibility factors showed the RT components attributable to the two stages influenced by these two variables to be stochastically independent. Relative stimulus frequency interacted with both quality and compatibility in determining RT. It was concluded that the effect of stimulus quality arose at the stimulus encoding stage, and the effect of compatibility at the S-R translation stage, while the duration of both stages was influenced by relative stimulus frequency.


2016 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giosuè Baggio ◽  
Carmelo M. Vicario

AbstractWe agree with Christiansen & Chater (C&C) that language processing and acquisition are tightly constrained by the limits of sensory and memory systems. However, the human brain supports a range of cognitive functions that mitigate the effects of information processing bottlenecks. The language system is partly organised around these moderating factors, not just around restrictions on storage and computation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document