A mathematical method for the analysis of heat capacity and thermal conductivity measurements by the heat pulse technique

1975 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gershenson ◽  
S. Alterovitz
2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 1537-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard J. Kluitenberg ◽  
Tamir Kamai ◽  
Jasper A. Vrugt ◽  
Jan W. Hopmans

1990 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 2416-2419 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bertolini ◽  
M. Cassettari ◽  
G. Salvetti ◽  
E. Tombari ◽  
S. Veronesi

Soil Research ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 447 ◽  
Author(s):  
KL Bristow ◽  
RD White ◽  
GJ Kluitenberg

Storage and transfer of heat in soils is governed by the soil thermal properties and these properties are therefore needed in many agricultural and engineering applications. In this paper we discuss solutions of the heat flow equation applicable to single and dual probe transient heating methods, and describe measurements made on air-dry sand to show how these methods can be used to obtain soil thermal properties. Measurements show that the two methods yield similar values of thermal conductivity. When determining thermal conductivity from the single probe data, it is best to use nonlinear curve fitting and to include a correction term in the model to account for the presence of the probe. Measurements of volumetric heat capacity made by using the dual probe heat-pulse method agreed well with independent estimates obtained using the de Vries method of summing the heat capacities of the soil constituents. The advantage of using the dual probe method together with the appropriate heat-pulse theory rather than the single probe is that all three soil thermal properties, the thermal diffusivity, volumetric heat capacity, and thermal conductivity, can be determined from a single heat-pulse measurement. Instantaneous heat-pulse theory can be used with the dual probe method to determine heat capacity from short duration heat-pulse data, but it should not be used to determine the thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity.


Cryogenics ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Lasjaunias ◽  
B. Picot ◽  
A. Ravex ◽  
D. Thoulouze ◽  
M. Vandorpe

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abayomi A. Akinwande ◽  
Adeolu A. Adediran ◽  
Oluwatosin A. Balogun ◽  
Oluwaseyi S. Olusoju ◽  
Olanrewaju S. Adesina

AbstractIn a bid to develop paper bricks as alternative masonry units, unmodified banana fibers (UMBF) and alkaline (1 Molar aqueous sodium hydroxide) modified banana fibers (AMBF), fine sand, and ordinary Portland cement were blended with waste paper pulp. The fibers were introduced in varying proportions of 0, 0.5, 1.0 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 wt% (by weight of the pulp) and curing was done for 28 and 56 days. Properties such as water and moisture absorption, compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths, thermal conductivity, and specific heat capacity were appraised. The outcome of the examinations carried out revealed that water absorption rose with fiber loading while AMBF reinforced samples absorbed lesser water volume than UMBF reinforced samples; a feat occasioned by alkaline treatment of banana fiber. Moisture absorption increased with paper bricks doped with UMBF, while in the case of AMBF-paper bricks, property value was noted to depreciate with increment in AMBF proportion. Fiber loading resulted in improvement of compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths and it was noted that AMBF reinforced samples performed better. The result of the thermal test showed that incorporation of UMBF led to depreciation in thermal conductivity while AMBF infusion in the bricks initiated increment in value. Opposite behaviour was observed for specific heat capacity as UMBF enhanced heat capacity while AMBF led to depreciation. Experimental trend analysis carried out indicates that curing length and alkaline modification of fiber were effective in maximizing the properties of paperbricks for masonry construction.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3241
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Powała ◽  
Andrzej Obraniak ◽  
Dariusz Heim

The implemented new legal regulations regarding thermal comfort, the energy performance of residential buildings, and proecological requirements require the design of new building materials, the use of which will improve the thermal efficiency of newly built and renovated buildings. Therefore, many companies producing building materials strive to improve the properties of their products by reducing the weight of the materials, increasing their mechanical properties, and improving their insulating properties. Currently, there are solutions in phase-change materials (PCM) production technology, such as microencapsulation, but its application on a large scale is extremely costly. This paper presents a solution to the abovementioned problem through the creation and testing of a composite, i.e., a new mixture of gypsum, paraffin, and polymer, which can be used in the production of plasterboard. The presented solution uses a material (PCM) which improves the thermal properties of the composite by taking advantage of the phase-change phenomenon. The study analyzes the influence of polymer content in the total mass of a composite in relation to its thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity, and diffusivity. Based on the results contained in this article, the best solution appears to be a mixture with 0.1% polymer content. It is definitely visible in the tests which use drying, hardening time, and paraffin absorption. It differs slightly from the best result in the thermal conductivity test, while it is comparable in terms of volumetric heat capacity and differs slightly from the best result in the thermal diffusivity test.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document