The effect of yeast cell immobilization on the proportion of selected by-products of ethanol fermentation

1991 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 879-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waldemar Sroka ◽  
Wiesŀaw Rzędowski
2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunao YAMADA ◽  
Noriyuki SHINOMIYA ◽  
Kiyoshi OHBA ◽  
Mitsuo SEKIKAWA ◽  
Yuji ODA

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
Richmond Godwin Afful ◽  
Tracy Naa Adoley Addotey ◽  
Samaila Boye Ajeje

Ethanol fermentation is a biological procedure which converts sugars such as glucose, fructose, and sucrose into cellular energy, producing ethanol and carbon dioxide as by-products. Since yeasts perform this conversion in the absence of oxygen, alcoholic fermentation is generally considered to be an anaerobic process. Ethanol fermentation has many uses, including the production of alcoholic beverages, the production of ethanol fuel, and bread making. The increasing demand for biofuels around the globe has also prompted the necessity to seek other means to meet the demands. In this review, the general ideologies, methodologies, general chemistry and biochemistry and conditions of the production of ethanol by fermentation engineering using Saccharomyces cerevisiae are highlighted. The quest to reduce pressure on staple foods has necessitated the attention now given to the use of lignocellulose biomass, despite the complexity of the process. It concludes by suggesting ways to improve yield and commercialization of the use of lignocellulosic biomass for ethanol fermentation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Balli ◽  
V. Flari ◽  
E. Sakellaraki ◽  
V. Schoina ◽  
M. Iconomopoulou ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 724-725 ◽  
pp. 1116-1121
Author(s):  
Mei Zhen Gong ◽  
Ru Ming Zhao ◽  
Zhi Jun Li ◽  
Juan Yao ◽  
Da Chun Gong

Effect of by-products from wet-oxidation explosion, such as formic acid, acetic acid, and furfural on the growth and fermentation, glycolysis and energy metabolism, cytomembrane integrality ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaewere studied. The results showed that the maximum tolerated concentra tion ofS. cerevisiaewas 1.8 g/L formic acid , 6.0 g/L acetic acid,2.5g/ furfural, respectively. The inhibition strengths of the typical inhibitors to ethanol fermentation were in the order of formic acid , acetic acid , furfural. When the concentration of these typical inhibitors is 1×IC80, acetic acid has the minimum impact on glycolysis and energy metabolism . When the concentration of these typical inhibitors was 2×IC80, furfural had minimum impact on glycolysis and energy metabolism. However , formic acid can inhibit strongly the glycolysis and energy metabolism ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaewith any concentration . When compared with ethanol, the impact of these typical inhibitors onS. cerevisiae's cytomembrane integrality was not very significant. When the concentration of these typical inhibitors varied from 1×IC80to 3×IC80, the results of the leak of Mg2+was 11%-20% formic acid, 5%-12% acetic acid, 4.5%-8.4% furfural, respectively. However, the result of ethanol that leaded to the leak of Mg2+was 55%.


1984 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Black ◽  
C. Webb ◽  
T. M. Matthews ◽  
B. Atkinson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document