Investigations into cut-marks on fossil bones of Lower Pleistocene age from Venta Micena (Orce, Granada province, Spain)

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gibert ◽  
C. Jimenez
1984 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Morlan

Cutting, fracturing, flaking, and polishing of bones and other osseous materials may in some instances be interpreted as evidence of former human activity. Such interpretations must avoid confusion with the wide variety of natural processes that alter bones. Reliable criteria are prerequisite to sound inferences based on bone, regardless of whether they have been redeposited or recovered from primary assemblages. Criteria must be defined by means of actualistic studies (neotaphonomy) and experiments that demonstrate causal relationships between patterns of alteration and the processes that produce them. The criteria can be empoyed in the interpretation of fossil bones (paleotaphonomy) on the basis of uniformitarian principles. At the present time, such relationships are relatively well understood in the case of cut marks on bones, and modest progress has been made in investigating fractured and flaked bones. Polished bones are little understood and difficult to interpret.


2019 ◽  
Vol 526 ◽  
pp. 155-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd A. Courtenay ◽  
José Yravedra ◽  
Julia Aramendi ◽  
Miguel Ángel Maté-González ◽  
David M. Martín-Perea ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-174
Author(s):  
Anton Ferdianto

Fossil bones and teeth usually are very common archeological findings. At many sites these remains, such as bones bearing cut marks, may provide unequivocal evidence for human occupation. Hence bones and teeth provide the ideal targets for directly dating of archeological levels. Combined ESR/U-series dating of fossil teeth has been increasingly used in geochronological research over the past three decades. Results prove that it can be potentially applied to the sites in different geological contexts (fluvial/lacustrine or karstic environments) over a timescale of 304-206 years. But to perform this dating method, there’s a step that we need to prepare and do. This article try to explain the procedure how we prepare teeth step by step until it’s ready to be measure.


Antiquity ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 91 (357) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidwan Singh Soni ◽  
Anujot Singh Soni

A recent study of the Quranwala Zone (QZ) of the north-west sub-Himalayas, India, presents evidence for anthropic activity during the Pliocene that includes a number of stone tools found in association with fossil animal bones with cut marks. Based on the date of the Pliocene rock outcrop, the tools and bones are suggested to date from 2.6 Ma (Gaillard et al. 2016). There is, however, a question mark over the context of these tools within an outcrop of Pliocene rocks and, hence, over the date of these tools and the fossil bones. The trench from which they were excavated at Masol 2 (Gaillard et al.2016: fig. 3) lies in a depression at the bottom of a slope; the description provided in section 2 of the paper by Gaillard et al. (2016) suggests that the stone tools may not have been in situ within the Pliocene levels, but had accumulated there and were mixed with the fragments of fossil bone due to geological processes. Moreover, many of the stone tools, such as the ‘simple choppers’ found in association with the fossil animal bones (Gaillard et al.2016: figs 6, 8, 9), are usually found on much more recent sites and are therefore unlikely to date from 2.6 Ma.


1999 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 612-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Dauphin ◽  
C. T. Williams ◽  
P. Andrews ◽  
C. Denys ◽  
Y. Fernandez-Jalvo

Paleobiology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Palmqvist ◽  
Bienvenido Martínez-Navarro ◽  
Alfonso Arribas

We report quantitative paleoecologic data on the large mammal assemblage preserved in lower Pleistocene deposits at Venta Micena (Orce, Granada, southeastern Spain). Taphonomic studies show that bones were collected mainly by hyaenids, which transported and deposited them near shallow dens. Differential fragmentation of major long bones was produced by hyaenas as a function of their density and marrow content. Strong selection of prey by carnivores—which preferentially killed juveniles, females, and individuals with diminished locomotor capabilities among ungulate prey species of larger body size—is indicated by (1) the abundance of remains of juvenile ungulates in relation to the average weight of adult individuals in each species, (2) attritional mortality profiles for ungulate species deduced from crown height measurements, (3) the presence of many metapodials with different osteopathologies in their epiphyses, such as arthrosis, and (4) a biased intersexual ratio of large bovids. Comparison of the frequencies with which modern African carnivores kill and scavenge ungulates from various size classes with the abundance of these size categories in the assemblage suggests that the Venta Micena hyaena (Pachycrocuta brevirostris) was a bone-cracking scavenger that fed largely on carcasses of ungulates preyed upon and partially consumed by fresh meat-eating carnivores such us saber-toothed felids (Homotherium latidens and Megantereon whitei) and wild dogs (Canis falconeri).


2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús M Torres ◽  
Concepción Borja ◽  
Enrique G Olivares

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 63-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Sánchez ◽  
J. Gibert ◽  
A. Malgosa ◽  
F. Ribot ◽  
Ll. Gibert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document